From: Eddie Kovsky <ekovsky@redhat.com>
To: Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>
Cc: Eddie Kovsky <ekovsky@redhat.com>,
Mattijs Korpershoek <mkorpershoek@kernel.org>,
Tobias Olausson <tobias@eub.se>,
Paul HENRYS <paul.henrys_ext@softathome.com>,
Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>, Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetb@redhat.com>,
a.fatoum@pengutronix.de, mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl,
u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Add support for OpenSSL Provider API
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2026 10:36:53 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aaHWNU0LQqJ0zNDD@daedalus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260219172836.GN3233182@bill-the-cat>
On 02/19/26, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 19, 2026 at 09:51:05AM -0700, Eddie Kovsky wrote:
>
> > On 01/29/26, Mattijs Korpershoek wrote:
> > > Hi Eddie,
> > >
> > > Thank you for the patch.
> > >
> >
> > Hi Mattijs
> >
> > Thanks for the review.
> >
> > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2026 at 09:45, Eddie Kovsky <ekovsky@redhat.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > The Engine API has been deprecated since the release of OpenSSL 3.0. End
> > > > users have been advised to migrate to the new Provider interface.
> > > > Several distributions have already removed support for engines, which is
> > > > preventing U-Boot from being compiled in those environments.
> > > >
> > > > Add support for the Provider API while continuing to support the existing
> > > > Engine API on distros shipping older releases of OpenSSL.
> > > >
> > > > This is based on similar work contributed by Jan Stancek updating Linux
> > > > to use the Provider interface.
> > > >
> > > > commit 558bdc45dfb2669e1741384a0c80be9c82fa052c
> > > > Author: Jan Stancek <jstancek@redhat.com>
> > > > Date: Fri Sep 20 19:52:48 2024 +0300
> > > >
> > > > sign-file,extract-cert: use pkcs11 provider for OPENSSL MAJOR >= 3
> > > >
> > > > The changes have been tested with the FIT signature verification vboot
> > > > tests on Fedora 42 and Debian 13. All 30 tests pass with both the legacy
> > > > Engine library installed and with the Provider API.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Eddie Kovsky <ekovsky@redhat.com>
> [snip]
> > Sure, I can update the comment for v4.
Hi Tom
>
> Since we're talking about v4, can you please make sure that for v4 it:
> - Passes CI https://docs.u-boot.org/en/latest/develop/ci_testing.html as
> that will cover some non-Linux host builds.
I don't have resources available to set up a Gitlab runner. Based on the
documentation you provided it seems like this wouldn't be effective for
me as a non-custodian.
I did use GitHub to trigger an Azure pipeline. There was one failure and
several errors in the binman Command Line test.
https://github.com/u-boot/u-boot/pull/875/checks?check_run_id=65015204887
These are PKCS11 errors, so of course I thought my patch was to blame.
But I'm seeing the same errors on Debian 13 running 'binman test'
manually on the master branch.
> - See if you can get access to a FreeBSD or OpenBSD host and make sure
> the tools build still works there too? I was hoping Mark would have
> commented / tested-by v3 because I do want to make sure the libressl
> case still builds. At worst case, I have a freebie Oracle VM that's
> FreeBSD based, so you can maybe spin one of those up as well?
>
I spent some time again setting up OpenBSD and FreeBSD virtual machines, but I was
unable to reproduce the build environment for U-Boot. But thanks to
Enric and Mark's work it looks like we have the LibreSSL use case
covered now.
Eddie
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-02-27 18:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-20 16:45 [PATCH v3] Add support for OpenSSL Provider API Eddie Kovsky
2026-01-29 20:08 ` Mattijs Korpershoek
2026-02-19 16:51 ` Eddie Kovsky
2026-02-19 17:28 ` Tom Rini
2026-02-24 12:08 ` Enric Balletbo i Serra
2026-02-24 15:48 ` Tom Rini
2026-02-24 22:23 ` Mark Kettenis
2026-02-27 17:36 ` Eddie Kovsky [this message]
2026-02-27 17:47 ` Tom Rini
2026-04-01 22:05 ` Eddie Kovsky
2026-04-02 16:27 ` Tom Rini
2026-02-25 16:16 ` Mattijs Korpershoek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aaHWNU0LQqJ0zNDD@daedalus \
--to=ekovsky@redhat.com \
--cc=a.fatoum@pengutronix.de \
--cc=eballetb@redhat.com \
--cc=jstancek@redhat.com \
--cc=mark.kettenis@xs4all.nl \
--cc=mkorpershoek@kernel.org \
--cc=paul.henrys_ext@softathome.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=tobias@eub.se \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox