From: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@kernel.org>
To: Balaji Selvanathan <balaji.selvanathan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: u-boot-qcom@groups.io, u-boot@lists.denx.de,
Lukasz Majewski <lukma@denx.de>,
Casey Connolly <casey.connolly@linaro.org>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>,
Aswin Murugan <aswin.murugan@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Stephan Gerhold <stephan.gerhold@linaro.org>,
Varadarajan Narayanan <quic_varada@quicinc.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@samsung.com>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com>,
Patrice Chotard <patrice.chotard@foss.st.com>,
Marek Vasut <marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org>,
Paul Sajna <sajattack@postmarketos.org>,
Abbarapu Venkatesh Yadav <venkyada@qti.qualcomm.com>,
Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] drivers: mmc: uclass: Set removable flag based on device tree property
Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 12:27:48 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <afRO7KbCEm1SdG0d@sumit-xelite> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421-emmc-v2-2-0ebd3322b676@oss.qualcomm.com>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2026 at 06:30:09PM +0530, Balaji Selvanathan wrote:
> The block device removable flag should reflect whether the MMC
> device is physically removable (SD card) or soldered (eMMC). This
> information is specified in the device tree via the "non-removable"
> property and stored in the MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE capability flag.
>
> Update the removable flag in the block device descriptor during
> controller probe to properly reflect the device's removable status.
> This allows the block layer and upper layers (particularly EFI boot
> manager) to distinguish between eMMC and SD cards for appropriate
> handling.
>
> The default removable=1 is set in mmc_bind(), and this change
> overrides it only for non-removable devices after mmc_of_parse()
> has set the MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE capability from the device tree.
>
> Reviewed-by: Varadarajan Narayanan <varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Balaji Selvanathan <balaji.selvanathan@oss.qualcomm.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Moved removable flag update from generic mmc-uclass.c to platform-
> specific msm_sdhci.c driver
Reviewed-by: Sumit Garg <sumit.garg@oss.qualcomm.com>
-Sumit
> ---
> drivers/mmc/msm_sdhci.c | 7 +++++++
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/msm_sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/msm_sdhci.c
> index 66f3cf2de4f..13fd4ae8a7d 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/msm_sdhci.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/msm_sdhci.c
> @@ -189,6 +189,7 @@ static int msm_sdc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> struct sdhci_host *host = &prv->host;
> u32 core_version, core_minor, core_major;
> struct reset_ctl bcr_rst;
> + struct blk_desc *bdesc;
> u32 caps;
> int ret;
>
> @@ -252,6 +253,12 @@ static int msm_sdc_probe(struct udevice *dev)
> if (ret)
> return ret;
>
> + if (plat->cfg.host_caps & MMC_CAP_NONREMOVABLE) {
> + bdesc = mmc_get_blk_desc(&plat->mmc);
> + if (bdesc)
> + bdesc->removable = 0;
> + }
> +
> host->mmc = &plat->mmc;
> host->mmc->dev = dev;
> host->ops = &msm_sdhci_ops;
>
> --
> 2.34.1
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-01 6:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 13:00 [PATCH v2 0/3] Enable eMMC and SD card support for QCS615 Balaji Selvanathan
2026-04-21 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] clk: qcom: qcs615: Add SDCC1 and SDCC2 clock support Balaji Selvanathan
2026-04-21 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drivers: mmc: uclass: Set removable flag based on device tree property Balaji Selvanathan
2026-05-01 6:57 ` Sumit Garg [this message]
2026-05-05 13:45 ` Casey Connolly
2026-04-21 13:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] configs: qcom_defconfig: Limit MMC transfer size to prevent controller timeout Balaji Selvanathan
2026-05-01 6:58 ` Sumit Garg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=afRO7KbCEm1SdG0d@sumit-xelite \
--to=sumit.garg@kernel.org \
--cc=aswin.murugan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=balaji.selvanathan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=casey.connolly@linaro.org \
--cc=jh80.chung@samsung.com \
--cc=loic.poulain@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=lukma@denx.de \
--cc=marek.vasut+renesas@mailbox.org \
--cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
--cc=patrice.chotard@foss.st.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=quic_varada@quicinc.com \
--cc=sajattack@postmarketos.org \
--cc=stephan.gerhold@linaro.org \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot-qcom@groups.io \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=varadarajan.narayanan@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=venkyada@qti.qualcomm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox