Re: [PATCH v2 06/16] LoongArch: skeleton and headers

[Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc>]

On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 11:47:00AM -0600, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 01, 2026 at 11:17:58AM +0000, Yao Zi wrote:
> 
> > From: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
> > 
> > Commit for directories, Kconfig, Makefile and headers
> > 
> > Some of them are copied from linux, some of them are derived
> > from other architectures, the rest are wriiten on my own.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <me@ziyao.cc>
> > ---
> > 
> > Hi Heinrich,
> > 
> > I kept the naming of CONFIG_ARCH_LA64 (instead of using the full name
> > ARCH_LOONGARCH64) since it's shorter, and we already have similar
> > CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I, and etc. in U-Boot. Is is okay for you?
> 
> We should use CONFIG_LOONGARCH here, to mirror the kernel I think. The
> CONFIG_ARCH_ namespace in U-Boot maps more to the usage of CONFIG_ARCH_
> in the kernel, for ARM (and ARM64) platforms rather than describing a
> CPU level architectural feature.

Oops, to make it clear, we do have a CONFIG_LOONGARCH symbol to
indicate LoongArch platforms, and CONFIG_ARCH_LA64 is for
distinguishing LA64 with LA32 and LA32R variants which would be
introduced in the future, just like the case of CONFIG_ARCH_RV32I and
CONFIG_ARCH_RV64I. Does this make sense for you?

> -- 
> Tom

Regards,
Yao Zi