From: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] any potential problems with beagle using OMAP34XX macros?
Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2009 03:06:09 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911170300290.24653@localhost> (raw)
i asked about this on the beagleboard list but i figure i can ask
here as well. while the beagleboard is based on the OMAP3530, if you
check out board/ti/beagle:
$ grep OMAP3 *
beagle.c: gd->bd->bi_arch_number = MACH_TYPE_OMAP3_BEAGLE;
beagle.c: gd->bd->bi_boot_params = (OMAP34XX_SDRC_CS0 + 0x100);
beagle.c: struct gpio *gpio5_base = (struct gpio *)OMAP34XX_GPIO5_BASE;
beagle.c: struct gpio *gpio6_base = (struct gpio *)OMAP34XX_GPIO6_BASE;
beagle.h: "OMAP3 Beagle board",
config.mk:# Beagle Board uses OMAP3 (ARM-CortexA8) cpu
$
as in, note the references to OMAP34XX macros, not OMAP35XX. and
that's because, in include/configs/omap3_beagle.h, all of the
references seem to be to OMAP34XX, such as:
/*
* High Level Configuration Options
*/
#define CONFIG_ARMCORTEXA8 1 /* This is an ARM V7 CPU core */
#define CONFIG_OMAP 1 /* in a TI OMAP core */
#define CONFIG_OMAP34XX 1 /* which is a 34XX */
#define CONFIG_OMAP3430 1 /* which is in a 3430 */
#define CONFIG_OMAP3_BEAGLE 1 /* working with BEAGLE */
almost all of the macros under include/asm/arch-omap3 are defined in
terms of OMAP34XX as well and while that may work fine for now, is
there any chance that could cause conflicts down the road?
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
next reply other threads:[~2009-11-17 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-11-17 8:06 Robert P. J. Day [this message]
2009-11-17 8:41 ` [U-Boot] any potential problems with beagle using OMAP34XX macros? Dirk Behme
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0911170300290.24653@localhost \
--to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox