From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
Date: Wed, 18 Nov 2009 02:01:52 -0500 (EST)
Subject: [U-Boot] is CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT actually being used
	anywhere?
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911180156580.16276@localhost>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de


  never afraid to embarrass myself, is the config option
CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT actually doing anything useful?

$ grep -r MMC_SELECT *
board/atmel/at91rm9200dk/Makefile:COBJS-$(CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT) += mux.o
board/atmel/at91rm9200ek/Makefile:COBJS-$(CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT) += mux.o
CHANGELOG:    at91: rename DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT to CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT
common/Makefile:COBJS-$(CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT) += cmd_dataflash_mmc_mux.o
include/at45.h:#ifdef	CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT
$

  i can see the commit that did a rename:

commit 90a92a708d5180a20d600ba0fc2352ec76dc3829
Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>
Date:   Fri Mar 27 23:26:42 2009 +0100

    at91: rename DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT to CONFIG_DATAFLASH_MMC_SELECT

    Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@jcrosoft.com>

but unless *someone* defines that macro, is it doing anything useful?
or am i just confused?

rday
--

========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================