* [U-Boot] possible typo in beagle identification?
@ 2009-11-20 16:07 Robert P. J. Day
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2009-11-20 16:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
at the risk of embarrassing myself yet again, am i misreading the
macro that defines and tests for a beagle board?
$ grep -rw CONFIG.*OMAP3.*BEAGLE *
include/configs/omap3_beagle.h:#define CONFIG_OMAP3_BEAGLE 1 /* working with BEAGLE */
include/asm-arm/mach-types.h:#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_OMAP3_BEAGLE
$
in short, the config file defines CONFIG_OMAP3_BEAGLE, while the
mach-types.h file *tests* for CONFIG_MACH_OMAP3_BEAGLE. how exactly
does that work? the more i read, the confuseder i get.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA
Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.
Web page: http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2009-11-20 16:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-11-20 16:07 [U-Boot] possible typo in beagle identification? Robert P. J. Day
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox