public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@crashcourse.ca>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] confused ... how do some CONFIG settings "implicitly" set others?
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 14:08:05 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911201405320.19935@localhost> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20091120184042.268493F6C2@gemini.denx.de>

On Fri, 20 Nov 2009, Wolfgang Denk wrote:

> Dear "Robert P. J. Day",
>
> In message <alpine.LFD.2.00.0911200826340.27923@localhost> you wrote:
> >
> >   reading http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/DULG/UBootSplashScreen, and i
> > see:
> >
> > "To enable splash screen support, you have to add a "#define
> > CONFIG_SPLASH_SCREEN" to your board configuration file. This will also
> > implicitly enable U-Boot Bitmap Support."
> >
> >   "implicitly"?  how does that work?  from what i can see in
> > define2mk.sed, the transformation is straightforward and there are no
> > dependencies or selects as in the kernel Kconfig structure.  how does
> > setting splash screen implicitly set bitmap support?  what am i
> > missing?
>
> Simple. The relevant parts of the code use
>
> 	#if defined(CONFIG_CMD_BMP) || defined(CONFIG_SPLASH_SCREEN)
>
> so they get selected when CONFIG_CMD_BMP and/or CONFIG_SPLASH_SCREEN
> is defined.

  ok, i get it, but that's not "implicit," that's *explicit*.
totally different meaning.

rday
--


========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day                               Waterloo, Ontario, CANADA

            Linux Consulting, Training and Kernel Pedantry.

Web page:                                          http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter:                                       http://twitter.com/rpjday
========================================================================

      reply	other threads:[~2009-11-20 19:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-11-20 13:29 [U-Boot] confused ... how do some CONFIG settings "implicitly" set others? Robert P. J. Day
2009-11-20 18:40 ` Wolfgang Denk
2009-11-20 19:08   ` Robert P. J. Day [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.00.0911201405320.19935@localhost \
    --to=rpjday@crashcourse.ca \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox