* [U-Boot] is it worth enhancing cmd_immap.c to handle 83xx?
@ 2015-12-22 11:13 Robert P. J. Day
2016-01-14 20:47 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Robert P. J. Day @ 2015-12-22 11:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
as i'm currently messing with MPC8360e-based board, is there any
value in submitting a patch so that cmd_immap.c can handle 83xx? it
seems pretty straightforward. i'm also working on the politics of
being allowed to submit a patch to deal with an MPC8360e-based system
currently being ported to linux so that that cmd_immap.c enhancement
would have actual value.
rday
--
========================================================================
Robert P. J. Day Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA
http://crashcourse.ca
Twitter: http://twitter.com/rpjday
LinkedIn: http://ca.linkedin.com/in/rpjday
========================================================================
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [U-Boot] is it worth enhancing cmd_immap.c to handle 83xx?
2015-12-22 11:13 [U-Boot] is it worth enhancing cmd_immap.c to handle 83xx? Robert P. J. Day
@ 2016-01-14 20:47 ` Tom Rini
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Tom Rini @ 2016-01-14 20:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: u-boot
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 06:13:45AM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> as i'm currently messing with MPC8360e-based board, is there any
> value in submitting a patch so that cmd_immap.c can handle 83xx? it
> seems pretty straightforward. i'm also working on the politics of
> being allowed to submit a patch to deal with an MPC8360e-based system
> currently being ported to linux so that that cmd_immap.c enhancement
> would have actual value.
If you're able to mainline other useful things with MPC83xx yes,
otherwise, probably not.
--
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.denx.de/pipermail/u-boot/attachments/20160114/7eb47e7d/attachment.sig>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2016-01-14 20:47 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-12-22 11:13 [U-Boot] is it worth enhancing cmd_immap.c to handle 83xx? Robert P. J. Day
2016-01-14 20:47 ` Tom Rini
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox