From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marek Vasut <marek.vasut@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2018 14:24:49 +0100
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 66/93] arm: Remove ot1200 board
In-Reply-To: <20181122125249.GA11247@bill-the-cat>
References: <20181119155413.158098-1-sjg@chromium.org>
 <20181119155413.158098-67-sjg@chromium.org>
 <CAH9NwWdwh32F2x8yb2+FWzBzREmc-Tnfwehn9K3DV8=GWmhFAg@mail.gmail.com>
 <20181122125249.GA11247@bill-the-cat>
Message-ID: <b49931ae-15fe-5dea-f054-afd91bf42ea9@gmail.com>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

On 11/22/2018 01:52 PM, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 10:25:14AM +0100, Christian Gmeiner wrote:
> 
>> Am Mo., 19. Nov. 2018 um 16:56 Uhr schrieb Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>:
>>>
>>> This board has not been converted to CONFIG_DM_BLK by the deadline.
>>> Remove it.
>>>
>>
>> As the board is still mainted I will NAK it for the moment. Are there
>> any hints want needs to be done
>> to port thie board over to new DM stuff?
> 
> Yes, as a start you need to switch over to using CONFIG_OF_CONTROL and
> selecting/providing a dtb file.  I see ot1200 is using DWC_AHSATA which
> needs more work, but this is the board-level work that needs doing.

Wasn't there a possibility to use platform data in board file instead of
DT ? Or is DT mandatory now , including the libfdt overhead ?

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut