U-Boot Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: OpenBSI and U-Boot
Date: Sat, 8 Aug 2020 11:32:43 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbd73c2e-e462-4f4d-eefc-e3171e96a8e2@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f9cf9b79-c605-ca74-05a0-792eb56f57f2@gmx.de>

On 8/8/20 10:59 AM, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:
> Hello Anup,
> 
> I have looking at you OpenSBI code firmware/payloads/test_head.S. Here

I think the real start is in firmware/fw_base.S. From there, secondary
harts loop first in _wait_relocate_copy_done, and then in
_wait_for_boot_hart, and then they execute the next stage via
_start_warm and sbi_init.

> like in U-Boot's common/spl/spl_opensbi.c you put all but one hart in to
> an enless loop (hang).

As far as I can tell, U-Boot has all harts execute the next stage when
SMP is enabled. smp_call_function has all harts execute that function.

> 
> When Linux boots via UEFI it will wake up the extra harts after
> ExitBootServices(). So I assume we should define function hang() in
> lib/hang.c as __efi_runtime to avoid seeing it overwritten by the EFI
> payload.
> 
> @Ard:
> Does Linux take care of the hanging harts and redirect them to its own
> routine before SetVirtualAddressMap()? Otherwise anything could happen.
> 
> On the Kendryte K210 we don't have SPL. So we will not boot in the
> sequence SPL->OpenSBI->U-Boot but OpenSBI->U-Boot. Does this imply that
> we have to implement the hart lottery at the entry point of main U-Boot
> in this case?

Isn't the hart lottery already implemented for U-Boot? E.g. around line
100 of arch/riscv/cpu/start.S.

On another note, does Linux support S-Mode NOMMU? I was under the
impression that NOMMU implied M-Mode (or the other way around).

--Sean

  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-08 15:32 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-08 14:59 OpenBSI and U-Boot Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-08 15:32 ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2020-08-08 16:17   ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-08 17:22     ` Sean Anderson
2020-08-08 18:56       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-09  1:48         ` Sean Anderson
2020-08-09  4:23           ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-09 10:02             ` Sean Anderson
2020-08-09 11:49           ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-09 20:08     ` Atish Patra
2020-08-09 20:28       ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-10  0:33         ` Atish Patra
2020-08-11  1:55         ` Rick Chen
2020-08-11  5:29           ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-08-11  7:06             ` Atish Patra
2020-08-12  1:37               ` Rick Chen
2020-08-09 19:54 ` Atish Patra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bbd73c2e-e462-4f4d-eefc-e3171e96a8e2@gmail.com \
    --to=seanga2@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox