From: "Mendez, Judith" <jm@ti.com>
To: "Kathpalia, Tanmay" <tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com>,
Tom Rini <trini@konsulko.com>, Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Cc: Francois Berder <fberder@outlook.fr>, <u-boot@lists.denx.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Add GPIO settle delay
Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2026 15:49:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbe028dd-b4ba-4e3c-995b-8ddabba35844@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3acc5bc7-86e6-4256-b9b9-67fb750a035b@altera.com>
Hi Tanmay,
On 7/13/2026 7:00 AM, Kathpalia, Tanmay wrote:
> Hi Judith,
>
> On 7/11/2026 4:34 AM, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> Some board designs have slow RC circuits on GPIO outputs controlled by
>> PCA953X I2C expanders. On some board designs, pin voltage transitions
>> can take significant time after I2C write command completes.
>>
>> Add an optional "gpio-settle-delay-ms" device tree property for the
>> pca953x driver to add a delay after I2C write if specified, allowing to
>> compensate for slow RC circuits.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/gpio/pca953x_gpio.c | 8 ++++++++
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/pca953x_gpio.c b/drivers/gpio/pca953x_gpio.c
>> index 965a5fcf30b..54b957069c9 100644
>> --- a/drivers/gpio/pca953x_gpio.c
>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/pca953x_gpio.c
>> @@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
>> #include <dm/device_compat.h>
>> #include <dt-bindings/gpio/gpio.h>
>> #include <linux/bitops.h>
>> +#include <linux/delay.h>
>> #define PCA953X_INPUT 0
>> #define PCA953X_OUTPUT 1
>> @@ -89,6 +90,7 @@ static const struct pca95xx_reg pca957x_regs = {
>> * @reg_output: array to hold the value of output registers
>> * @reg_direction: array to hold the value of direction registers
>> * @regs: struct to hold the registers addresses
>> + * @settle_delay_ms: GPIO pin settle delay in milliseconds
>> */
>> struct pca953x_info {
>> struct udevice *dev;
>> @@ -100,6 +102,7 @@ struct pca953x_info {
>> u8 reg_output[MAX_BANK];
>> u8 reg_direction[MAX_BANK];
>> const struct pca95xx_reg *regs;
>> + u32 settle_delay_ms;
>> };
>> static int pca953x_write_single(struct udevice *dev, int reg, u8 val,
>> @@ -116,6 +119,9 @@ static int pca953x_write_single(struct udevice
>> *dev, int reg, u8 val,
>> return ret;
>> }
>> + if (info->settle_delay_ms)
>> + mdelay(info->settle_delay_ms);
>> +
>> return 0;
>> }
>
> This delay is placed inside pca953x_write_single(), which is called by both
> pca953x_set_value() and pca953x_set_direction(). This results in a
> double delay
> for every direction_output call, which I think is unintended.
>
> Additionally, a settle delay is only meaningful after changing an output
> level — it represents the time for the pin voltage to physically settle
> (e.g.
> through an RC circuit). Firing it on direction register writes does not
> make
> sense. The delay should be scoped only to pca953x_set_value().
Yea did not intended.
>
>> @@ -333,6 +339,8 @@ static int pca953x_probe(struct udevice *dev)
>> info->bank_count = DIV_ROUND_UP(info->gpio_count, BANK_SZ);
>> + info->settle_delay_ms = dev_read_u32_default(dev, "gpio-settle-
>> delay-ms", 0);
>> +
>
> As Francesco mentioned, adding u-boot specifc properties causes the U-
> Boot DT
> to diverge from the Linux DT, which violates U-Boot's policy of
> maintaining DT
> compatibility with Linux.
>
>> ret = pca953x_read_regs(dev, info->regs->output, info->reg_output);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(dev, "Error reading output register\n");
>
> Given that the delay is due to a slow RC circuit on the output, I would
> suggest
> looking at the gpio-delay (gpio-delay.c, binding at gpio-delay.yaml). It is
> designed precisely for this scenario:
> "This binding describes an electrical setup where setting a GPIO output is
> delayed by some external setup, e.g. RC circuit."
Thanks, Ill check that out.
~ Judith
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-13 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 23:04 [PATCH] gpio: pca953x: Add GPIO settle delay Judith Mendez
2026-07-13 7:07 ` Francesco Dolcini
2026-07-13 20:48 ` Mendez, Judith
2026-07-13 12:00 ` Kathpalia, Tanmay
2026-07-13 20:49 ` Mendez, Judith [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbe028dd-b4ba-4e3c-995b-8ddabba35844@ti.com \
--to=jm@ti.com \
--cc=fberder@outlook.fr \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=tanmay.kathpalia@altera.com \
--cc=trini@konsulko.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox