[PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[Maxim Cournoyer]

This reverts commit 648d8186dd7f9c444fb07f355090d275dcdd4de4, because
it broke usage of patman on Linux, whose check script doesn't know
about '--strict' or '--u-boot'.

Reported-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
---

 tools/patman/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/patman/checkpatch.py b/tools/patman/checkpatch.py
index 012c0d895c..d1b902dd96 100644
--- a/tools/patman/checkpatch.py
+++ b/tools/patman/checkpatch.py
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ def check_patch(fname, verbose=False, show_types=False, use_tree=False):
             stdout: Full output of checkpatch
     """
     chk = find_check_patch()
-    args = [chk, '--u-boot', '--strict']
+    args = [chk]
     if not use_tree:
         args.append('--no-tree')
     if show_types:

base-commit: 87c9e117bf57d6bb42c5521a3f6ec9ca7d97e5fa
-- 
2.38.1

[PATCH 2/2] patman: symlink top level .checkpatch.conf

[Maxim Cournoyer]

This makes it possible to run the patman test suite simply by invoking
'pytest' from the patman sub-directory:

  $ cd tools/patman
  $ pytest

Otherwise, the top level .checkpatch.conf would be ignored and
multiple test_checkpatch.py tests would fail.

Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
---

 .gitignore                    | 1 +
 tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf | 1 +
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
 create mode 120000 tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf

diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore
index eb769f144c..3adf1faf4e 100644
--- a/.gitignore
+++ b/.gitignore
@@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
 # Normal rules (sorted alphabetically)
 #
 .*
+!.checkpatch.conf
 *.a
 *.asn1.[ch]
 *.bin
diff --git a/tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf b/tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf
new file mode 120000
index 0000000000..c0e2020afe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf
@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+../../.checkpatch.conf
\ No newline at end of file
-- 
2.38.1

Re: [PATCH 2/2] patman: symlink top level .checkpatch.conf

[Simon Glass]

On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 06:51, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This makes it possible to run the patman test suite simply by invoking
> 'pytest' from the patman sub-directory:
>
>   $ cd tools/patman
>   $ pytest
>
> Otherwise, the top level .checkpatch.conf would be ignored and
> multiple test_checkpatch.py tests would fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>
>  .gitignore                    | 1 +
>  tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>  create mode 120000 tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf
>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[Simon Glass]

On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 06:50, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This reverts commit 648d8186dd7f9c444fb07f355090d275dcdd4de4, because
> it broke usage of patman on Linux, whose check script doesn't know
> about '--strict' or '--u-boot'.
>
> Reported-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>
>  tools/patman/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[Sjoerd Simons]

On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 08:50 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> This reverts commit 648d8186dd7f9c444fb07f355090d275dcdd4de4, because
> it broke usage of patman on Linux, whose check script doesn't know
> about '--strict' or '--u-boot'.

I can confirm that this reverts fixes the reported issue:

Tested-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>

> 
> Reported-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
> 
>  tools/patman/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/tools/patman/checkpatch.py b/tools/patman/checkpatch.py
> index 012c0d895c..d1b902dd96 100644
> --- a/tools/patman/checkpatch.py
> +++ b/tools/patman/checkpatch.py
> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ def check_patch(fname, verbose=False,
> show_types=False, use_tree=False):
>              stdout: Full output of checkpatch
>      """
>      chk = find_check_patch()
> -    args = [chk, '--u-boot', '--strict']
> +    args = [chk]
>      if not use_tree:
>          args.append('--no-tree')
>      if show_types:
> 
> base-commit: 87c9e117bf57d6bb42c5521a3f6ec9ca7d97e5fa

-- 
Sjoerd Simons
Collabora Ltd.

Re: [PATCH 2/2] patman: symlink top level .checkpatch.conf

[Simon Glass]

On Fri, 13 Jan 2023 at 06:51, Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This makes it possible to run the patman test suite simply by invoking
> 'pytest' from the patman sub-directory:
>
>   $ cd tools/patman
>   $ pytest
>
> Otherwise, the top level .checkpatch.conf would be ignored and
> multiple test_checkpatch.py tests would fail.
>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>
>  .gitignore                    | 1 +
>  tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf | 1 +
>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>  create mode 120000 tools/patman/.checkpatch.conf
>

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>

Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[Simon Glass]

On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 08:50 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> This reverts commit 648d8186dd7f9c444fb07f355090d275dcdd4de4, because
> it broke usage of patman on Linux, whose check script doesn't know
> about '--strict' or '--u-boot'.

I can confirm that this reverts fixes the reported issue:

Tested-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>

>
> Reported-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> ---
>
>  tools/patman/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[Marcel Ziswiler]

Hi Simon

On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 21:11 -0500, Simon Glass wrote:
> On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 08:50 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> > This reverts commit 648d8186dd7f9c444fb07f355090d275dcdd4de4, because
> > it broke usage of patman on Linux, whose check script doesn't know
> > about '--strict' or '--u-boot'.
> 
> I can confirm that this reverts fixes the reported issue:
> 
> Tested-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> 
> > 
> > Reported-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > ---
> > 
> >  tools/patman/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
> >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > 
> Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!

I also just stumbled over this and learned now that it already got fixed. Thanks!

Cheers

Marcel

Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "patman: invoke the checkpatch.pl script with '--u-boot' and '--strict'"

[Simon Glass]

On Thu, 19 Jan 2023 at 03:24, Marcel Ziswiler
<marcel.ziswiler@toradex.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Simon
>
> On Wed, 2023-01-18 at 21:11 -0500, Simon Glass wrote:
> > On Fri, 2023-01-13 at 08:50 -0500, Maxim Cournoyer wrote:
> > > This reverts commit 648d8186dd7f9c444fb07f355090d275dcdd4de4, because
> > > it broke usage of patman on Linux, whose check script doesn't know
> > > about '--strict' or '--u-boot'.
> >
> > I can confirm that this reverts fixes the reported issue:
> >
> > Tested-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> >
> > >
> > > Reported-by: Sjoerd Simons <sjoerd@collabora.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Maxim Cournoyer <maxim.cournoyer@savoirfairelinux.com>
> > > ---
> > >
> > >  tools/patman/checkpatch.py | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > Applied to u-boot-dm, thanks!
>
> I also just stumbled over this and learned now that it already got fixed. Thanks!

OK good!

- Simon
> Cheers
>
> Marcel