From: Vignesh R <vigneshr@ti.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework
Date: Sat, 15 Dec 2018 21:13:01 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c1902a0d-eafa-e8f8-dfcb-589aaae24961@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMty3ZBdtC-PkT4UaqHF76iw4W4UogyAAJSYLcrHxQk4zz=47Q@mail.gmail.com>
>>> 2) For BAR support, lets place it as it is and support via spi-nor
>>
>> Problem is, it not desirable to use BAR as default because its not
>> stateless and does not work with all flash parts. OTOH, it seems like 4
>> byte addressing (stateless dedicated opcode or with enter/exit 4 byte
>> mode) seems to be standard.
>> Also, Linux doesn't support BAR and haven't seen any request for BAR
>> support. Why support additional feature and burden of maintaining when
>> it may not be needed.
>>
>> But if you insist, I just have to add BAR support back.
>
> It's not about insistence, ie how we support since from long and
> u-boot bootloader project does in general. bootloader can be some
> certain boot difference functionalities unlike Linux, it's better not
> to compare u-boot with Linux in all cases.
>
> Example we have SPI_TX_BYTE which usually not supported in Linux.
> Since it's ich controller specific and it require for bootloader to do
> byte tx on that specific controller, so we supported. Same for the
> case with the BAR, this specific controller(or supported boards) has
> been in U-Boot since from long and they do upstream well. So we need
> to support BAR in any case or we can find any alternative to work the
> same functionalities. (we tried before but ended-up adding BAR)
>
How about this instead?
Lets use 4 byte addressing opcodes as default for >16MB flashes.
But if CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_BAR is enabled then, spi-nor layer will use BAR
registers for >16MB access instead of 4 byte addressing.
I will remove SPI_FLASH_BAR from defconfigs from all boards expect those
controllers that really cannot handle 4 byte addressing. From a quick
glance it looks following controllers support only 3 byte addresses:
stm32_qspi.c
ich.c
fsl_qspi.c
renesas_rpc_spi.c
mtk_qspi.c
So, except for boards with above controllers, I will remove
SPI_FLASH_BAR for all other boards. If there is a regression, then such
boards can go back to enabling CONFIG_SPI_FLASH_BAR.
AFAIU, above controller HWs(except ich perhaps) can support 4 byte
addressing but would need to move to spi-mem.
Regards
Vignesh
ex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-12-15 15:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 71+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-12 17:32 [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 01/16] spi: spi-mem: Allow use of spi_mem_exec_op for all SPI modes Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 02/16] spi-mem: Claim SPI bus before spi mem access Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 03/16] spi: Add non DM version of SPI_MEM Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:25 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 20:40 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 20:45 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 21:02 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 21:07 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 21:25 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 23:10 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 23:20 ` Tom Rini
2018-12-12 23:55 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-14 9:59 ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-04 21:28 ` Simon Glass
2018-12-13 9:38 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-13 9:41 ` Miquel Raynal
2018-12-13 8:50 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 10:02 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-14 10:57 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 13:59 ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-28 6:57 ` Jagan Teki
2019-01-28 9:45 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 04/16] sh: bitops: add hweight*() macros Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 05/16] mtd: spi: Port SPI NOR framework from Linux Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:31 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 22:56 ` Tom Rini
2018-12-12 23:21 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-13 3:01 ` Tom Rini
2018-12-13 7:47 ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-13 11:44 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 06/16] mtd: spi: Switch to new SPI NOR framework Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 07/16] mtd: spi: Remove unused files Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:38 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-13 9:07 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 08/16] mtd: spi: Add lightweight SPI flash stack for SPL Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 09/16] sf_mtd: Simply mtd operations Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:31 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-13 2:11 ` Daniel Schwierzeck
2018-12-13 7:46 ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-13 8:24 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-13 9:40 ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 10/16] configs: Get rid of SPI_FLASH_BAR Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:41 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 20:51 ` Boris Brezillon
2018-12-12 20:54 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2018-12-13 10:41 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 11/16] configs: Remove SF_DUAL_FLASH Vignesh R
2018-12-12 20:50 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 12/16] axm_defconfig: Enable simple malloc in SPL Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 13/16] taurus_defconfig: " Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 14/16] da850_am18xxevm: Enable tiny printf Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 15/16] turris_omnia_defconfig: " Vignesh R
2018-12-12 17:32 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 16/16] MAINTAINERS: Add an entry for SPI NOR Vignesh R
2018-12-12 21:01 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-14 8:03 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 10:13 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 00/16] SF: Migrate to Linux SPI NOR framework Jagan Teki
2018-12-14 15:54 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 16:14 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2018-12-14 16:27 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-14 16:38 ` Simon Goldschmidt
2018-12-14 16:42 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-15 13:59 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-15 14:42 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-15 6:31 ` Stefan Roese
2018-12-15 13:54 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-15 15:43 ` Vignesh R [this message]
2018-12-18 12:32 ` Jagan Teki
2018-12-18 17:19 ` Vignesh R
2018-12-21 8:55 ` Ashish Kumar
2018-12-15 15:43 ` Vignesh R
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c1902a0d-eafa-e8f8-dfcb-589aaae24961@ti.com \
--to=vigneshr@ti.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox