From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>
Date: Wed, 24 Feb 2021 19:08:51 +0100
Subject: [PATCH 4/4] net: dsa: remove master santiy check
In-Reply-To: <20210224174556.7wxo2ucmq7gu7shm@skbuf>
References: <20210224164042.21747-1-michael@walle.cc>
 <20210224164042.21747-5-michael@walle.cc>
 <20210224171111.lqzq3gpiqf4fkm4e@skbuf>
 <46b918d16c0e79f1b0bff538c9b28f69@walle.cc>
 <20210224174556.7wxo2ucmq7gu7shm@skbuf>
Message-ID: <ca894e531fec2b135db4ac54b6fc69ed@walle.cc>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Am 2021-02-24 18:45, schrieb Vladimir Oltean:
> On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 06:29:39PM +0100, Michael Walle wrote:
>> What is the reason to remove that device in the first place? Like is
>> this really a valid scenario? I really don't know when a device is
>> removed and if its remove, will it still be there or is it rather
>> a hot-plug type and rebinding it won't work anyways.
> 
> Did you get this to crash under any circumstance other than using the
> 'unbind' command?

Nope, thus I was curious about that comment in dsa_port_stop(). Someone
(Alex, Claudiu maybe?) must have something in mind when writing about 
it.
But I couldn't figure out in which case a device is removed.

-michael