From: Roman Bacik <roman.bacik@broadcom.com>
To: "Marek Behún" <kabel@kernel.org>
Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>,
U-Boot Mailing List <u-boot@lists.denx.de>,
Bharat Gooty <bharat.gooty@broadcom.com>,
Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>,
Bin Meng <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>,
Franck LENORMAND <franck.lenormand@nxp.com>,
Heinrich Schuchardt <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>,
Patrick Delaunay <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>,
Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>,
Priyanka Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>,
Rayagonda Kokatanur <rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@seco.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v3 2/2] cmd: brcm: netXtreme commands
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2021 08:05:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cfecdadbba329c4592563643c1bb6958@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211026184950.47bcd1af@thinkpad>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4305 bytes --]
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, October 26, 2021 9:50 AM
> To: Roman Bacik <roman.bacik@broadcom.com>
> Cc: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>; U-Boot Mailing List <u-
> boot@lists.denx.de>; Bharat Gooty <bharat.gooty@broadcom.com>;
> Aswath Govindraju <a-govindraju@ti.com>; Bin Meng
> <bmeng.cn@gmail.com>; Franck LENORMAND
> <franck.lenormand@nxp.com>; Heinrich Schuchardt
> <xypron.glpk@gmx.de>; Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>;
> Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com>; Patrick Delaunay
> <patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com>; Peng Fan <peng.fan@nxp.com>; Priyanka
> Jain <priyanka.jain@nxp.com>; Rayagonda Kokatanur
> <rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com>; Sean Anderson
> <sean.anderson@seco.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] cmd: brcm: netXtreme commands
>
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 09:02:54 -0700
> Roman Bacik <roman.bacik@broadcom.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Oct 26, 2021 at 8:55 AM Marek Behún <kabel@kernel.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 08:14:28 -0700
> > > Roman Bacik <roman.bacik@broadcom.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Marek,
> > > >
> > > > We do not want this driver to be automatically probed. It is not
> > > > needed
> > > > all the time and also slows down the boot time. We have stripped
> > > > down
> > > > everything else to bare minimum.
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Roman
> > >
> > > Hi Roman,
> > >
> > > OK, that is reasonable, but not reasonable enough to introduce a new
> > > vendor specific command.
> > >
> > > Still NAK.
> > >
> > > So you have the bnxt_drv_probe method defined in the driver, but you
> > > don't set a pointer to it into the U_BOOT_DRIVER structure, and
> > > instead
> > > you call this method when "brcm probe" command is called.
> > >
> > > I think this introduction of another vendor specific command is wrong.
> > >
> > > If probing takes too much time and should be done only when the device
> > > is needed, there are 2 things you could do:
> > >
> > > - you can create new driver flag saying that the device should be
> > > probeb only when needed, wire necessary code and add this flag to
> your
> > > driver (this could get very complicated, though)
> > > - you can do minimum stuff in probe method, and move the stuff that
> > > takes long time into bnxt_start(), which is called only when network
> > > via this ethernet controller is requested for by U-Boot commands.
> >
> > So renaming bnxt probe/remove to bnxt start/stop will do, right?
>
> No. The whole idea of adding the new "bnxt" command is wrong, because
> the command is *vendor specific*. The ethernet controller should work
> out of the box with standard U-Boot commands, i.e. it if I use the
> dhcp
> command, it should work, without needing to call the "bnxt" command.
Hi Marek,
In order to speed up the boot, we do not load bnxt driver on each boot. Also
we do not need to load FW and initialize PCI required to bind bnxt. When
bnxt is required, then we execute these commands:
chimp_ld_secure #this command loads FW, which is necessary for PCIe to
enumerate it
pci enum #this command is necessary to call bnxt_bind
bnxt 0 probe #this command would probe/load the driver
Do you have a suggestion on how to make this work without introducing bnxt
commands if we do not want to enumerate PCIe, load FW and load bnxt on each
boot? Currently we boot to uboot prompt in 1s, which is our requirement.
Thanks,
Roman
--
This electronic communication and the information and any files transmitted
with it, or attached to it, are confidential and are intended solely for
the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain
information that is confidential, legally privileged, protected by privacy
laws, or otherwise restricted from disclosure to anyone else. If you are
not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the
e-mail to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use,
copying, distributing, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of
this e-mail is strictly prohibited. If you received this e-mail in error,
please return the e-mail to the sender, delete it from your computer, and
destroy any printed copy of it.
[-- Attachment #2: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature --]
[-- Type: application/pkcs7-signature, Size: 4206 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-27 15:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-25 23:44 [PATCH v3 1/2] net: brcm: netXtreme driver Roman Bacik
2021-10-25 23:44 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] cmd: brcm: netXtreme commands Roman Bacik
2021-10-26 13:17 ` Marek Behún
2021-10-26 15:14 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-26 15:55 ` Marek Behún
2021-10-26 16:02 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-26 16:40 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-26 16:52 ` Marek Behún
2021-10-26 16:59 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-26 16:49 ` Marek Behún
2021-10-27 15:05 ` Roman Bacik [this message]
2021-10-27 15:41 ` Simon Glass
2021-10-27 16:05 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-27 16:35 ` Marek Behún
2021-10-27 16:47 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-27 17:02 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-27 17:39 ` Marek Behún
2021-10-27 17:58 ` Roman Bacik
2021-10-27 18:02 ` Marek Behún
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cfecdadbba329c4592563643c1bb6958@mail.gmail.com \
--to=roman.bacik@broadcom.com \
--cc=a-govindraju@ti.com \
--cc=bharat.gooty@broadcom.com \
--cc=bmeng.cn@gmail.com \
--cc=franck.lenormand@nxp.com \
--cc=kabel@kernel.org \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=michal.simek@xilinx.com \
--cc=patrick.delaunay@foss.st.com \
--cc=peng.fan@nxp.com \
--cc=priyanka.jain@nxp.com \
--cc=rayagonda.kokatanur@broadcom.com \
--cc=sean.anderson@seco.com \
--cc=sjg@chromium.org \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
--cc=xypron.glpk@gmx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox