From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53FD8C3DA42 for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 04:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id B58E5885AE; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:10:29 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (1024-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ti.com header.i=@ti.com header.b="GHwNQhu3"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 86FDC885B5; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:10:28 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lelv0143.ext.ti.com (lelv0143.ext.ti.com [198.47.23.248]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D8E28841D for ; Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=ti.com Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-kumar1@ti.com Received: from fllv0035.itg.ti.com ([10.64.41.0]) by lelv0143.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46H4AFnG018324; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:10:15 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1721189415; bh=AmAsOBSnylzJ6HlZpPARxtD4JR7swh0AdcThoC+pFBQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:CC:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=GHwNQhu3hhyRka1u+gfIhgn3TtudyxP2sHezxCfE5jvY3h9DKZ+9HsMEvGqygGrLf +mnVzPCuRiaaTwpS8XwY8S46spPZgYOjKMXvNYlZIH8vHRpFKCy6kYNA7n9qegZ1ek ss65wLn/YJt/efjxo+F2HPTKwNEFnXbC0em7xSNI= Received: from DLEE111.ent.ti.com (dlee111.ent.ti.com [157.170.170.22]) by fllv0035.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 46H4AFGq017119 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:10:15 -0500 Received: from DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) by DLEE111.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.22) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:10:15 -0500 Received: from lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (10.180.75.249) by DLEE107.ent.ti.com (157.170.170.37) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.23 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:10:15 -0500 Received: from [172.24.29.211] (lt5cd2489kgj.dhcp.ti.com [172.24.29.211]) by lelvsmtp6.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 46H4ACZd068097; Tue, 16 Jul 2024 23:10:13 -0500 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2024 09:40:11 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] configs: j784s4_evm : Increase Dynamic memory allocation size To: Francesco Dolcini CC: , , , , , , , References: <20240715174301.2688466-1-u-kumar1@ti.com> <20240716200555.GC85916@francesco-nb> Content-Language: en-US From: "Kumar, Udit" In-Reply-To: <20240716200555.GC85916@francesco-nb> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean Hi Francesco On 7/17/2024 1:35 AM, Francesco Dolcini wrote: > Hello, > > On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 11:13:01PM +0530, Udit Kumar wrote: >> Increase malloc size to 32 MB to align with other J7 >> family devices. > Is this needed for any specific reason? I am asking to understand if > other boards using the same SOC should be updated to prevent > $random_issue. In our downstream version, we are seeing an issue , while using DFU to MMC Please see https://gist.github.com/uditkumarti/b8209f61eff3154f6eb288ba63715263#file-gistfile1-txt-L82 Since DFU is not supported yet in mainline u-boot, so I avoided to mention that failure. Also this change is generic, so i thought of pushing it now instead of waiting for DFU series. > Francesco >