From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wolfram Wadepohl Date: Tue, 11 Apr 2006 08:06:19 +0200 Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: BDI vs. Lauterbach In-Reply-To: <20060410153222.A513C353B3C@atlas.denx.de> References: <427722615.20060410170041@varma-el.com> <20060410153222.A513C353B3C@atlas.denx.de> Message-ID: List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Wolfgang Denk schrieb: > Another pro for the BDI: they have *excellent* support. I know a > couple of vendors of hardware and tools etc. Some of them are really > good, but Abatron beats them all. This is also true for Lauterbach. We are working with Lauterbach for nearly 10 years have experienced always excellent support. Implementing a new RTOS support: no problem. If you only use a linux based development, Abatron may fit. If you use different development systems, like Windows and Linux, Lauterbach is far better. -- Sch?ne Gr??e aus Reutlingen Wolfram Wadepohl Forschung & Entwicklung E&K AUTOMATION Indumat GmbH & Co. KG