From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from phobos.denx.de (phobos.denx.de [85.214.62.61]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA48EC19F32 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 05:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: from h2850616.stratoserver.net (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1835780E94; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 06:42:32 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=phobos-20191101; t=1741326152; bh=vRfA0n+w0K7eWR4O92WGfZO/RKjzNH9MnDg3blOOLBQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:List-Id: List-Unsubscribe:List-Archive:List-Post:List-Help:List-Subscribe: From; b=ysbTZfwl9dEm2bDP6z44RevjY0Hmlght2qyGJ5zD5dhu0DxELHRkVVmFIaNJDU31g em2Hmao9ND9mo3+Bn2EjtLEpKz/J0zV/i82eWZuK0a728bJE4nDQMoMEeNN3kb2vBU EoLXByRfU4fogIpXT8axo3KlDm6SEJfNHVFmQbRjMgD1h/K8VWe7SAqSb5jrK1vudt A2gp3E/aOLAATETJ+Vq5FUDkyTB/dugUBReve3xDGV9YLDyzOGKoZmk5lAj84+nqtu STpdQr7zlYzoOjYbL1voUQHa3y71Yo6AEUg5a40VqulPOYTe72ry7Ijg8d79zieIWj bsELWCb+KAhaQ== Received: by phobos.denx.de (Postfix, from userid 109) id 1A8D480F4C; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 06:42:31 +0100 (CET) Received: from mx.denx.de (mx.denx.de [89.58.32.78]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by phobos.denx.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 965C8808A2 for ; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 06:42:28 +0100 (CET) Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=marex@denx.de Authentication-Results: phobos.denx.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=denx.de header.i=@denx.de header.b="aukqKtXm"; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Mailerdaemon) with ESMTPSA id E8DFB1038191D; Fri, 7 Mar 2025 06:42:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=denx.de; s=mx-20241105; t=1741326147; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-language:in-reply-to:references; bh=vRfA0n+w0K7eWR4O92WGfZO/RKjzNH9MnDg3blOOLBQ=; b=aukqKtXmE51vC4XkWAtHx2MiYbc7u6UOP5Vs2+V6Xo7aNZaz52lq053Twl+iXvZhjGRNfi mKvmTdOoksG12P+Cdtes0FOmeyI+XU6NLoMjkFFM5stH9W0kXOwt7SStsJCrPIHy/HP5Ei pBBuiRU+0ZCUzZ1h4G+e7UifuFgQddAGRy9+gLf82n06xLXehZW3PPX8dL/ZPalEmf3/gG 7+OQaiJ3IB2kd6MGT0m5u0IRspsEbRwSB7E+xcYjFAVrLelMRfPHKLoZb9ARkef7FVRNks qRuecQryUxwfAGyNsvCfbchylCJ7vm+hNcG+NesXeos+G5lHQhd9LbdV9OBbbg== Message-ID: Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2025 06:42:24 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] binman: Fill in most of the imx8mimage and imx8mcst tests To: Simon Glass Cc: U-Boot Mailing List , Brian Ruley , Paul HENRYS , Rasmus Villemoes , Tim Harvey , Tom Rini References: <20250105203714.158480-1-marex@denx.de> <1b77dd3f-e0f3-492b-981f-1dc9962f1732@denx.de> <8647abd3-9378-42cf-a1fa-302c7891d439@denx.de> Content-Language: en-US From: Marek Vasut In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Last-TLS-Session-Version: TLSv1.3 X-BeenThere: u-boot@lists.denx.de X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39 Precedence: list List-Id: U-Boot discussion List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: u-boot-bounces@lists.denx.de Sender: "U-Boot" X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.103.8 at phobos.denx.de X-Virus-Status: Clean On 3/7/25 3:18 AM, Simon Glass wrote: Hi, >>>>> One of the main goals of binman is to reduce the work needed to create >>>>> a working image. If people have to go spelunking around the Internet, >>>>> build it themselves, etc. that is not good. >>>> What you are asking me for is not the tool itself, but key material, >>>> which is generated by these scripts. >>> >>> It looks like someone has done this here: >>> >>> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=446218 >>> >>> so I think we are OK now. >>> >>> I've applied that series to my tree. >> OK, does anything need to be done about this patch ? > > I'm not sure, but we should apply it anyway as it is a big step forward. > > I did send a series to turn on code-coverage checks: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/list/?series=446956 So what should we do about this particular patch ? Should this be applied ? Rebased ? Updated somehow ?