From: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] efi_loader: add udevice to EFI device-path mapping
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2017 18:46:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f2f1bf99-06e9-d8cf-69c0-e25ecf995485@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAF6AEGs9tqDu2Mkr13U_tPvtOfyXpO=yu3eCcsqfVp92uhMeyw@mail.gmail.com>
On 25.07.17 15:57, Rob Clark wrote:
> So the static bootefi_device_obj is making things slightly awkward for
> efi_load_image() from a file-path. And really it should just go away,
> and instead we should plug in the appropriate diskobj (or netobj) to
> the loaded_image_obj at boot time. Also we should nuke
> bootefi_device_path. And since we need to construct a new
> loaded_image_obj in efi_load_image(), probably split out a helper to
> fill that out properly and plug in the correct boot device-path, etc,
> etc, so we don't have too many different places constructing the same
> sort of object and forgetting to install some protocols in one place
> or another.
>
> And since there are a lot of places we need to map to device-path and
> back, I'm starting to thing the sane way to do all this without
> breaking legacy (!CONFIG_DM) is to introduce a efi_device_path.c and
> efi_device_path_legacy.c. Move all the hacky stuff of current
> devicepath construction into efi_device_path_legacy.c. Add some
> device-path parsing/matching stuff to efi_device_path_util.c (which
> probably just be efi_device_path_to_text.c renamed and then spiffed
> out with some more device-path helpers), which would be shared in
> common in legacy and CONFIG_DM cases.
>
> Sound semi-reasonable? I'm not sure if this intersects too badly with
Sounds reasonable to me :).
> other stuff Heinrich is working on?
I don't know - I'll let him comment.
>
> (Also, small logistical question.. anyone know how to do
> "obj-$(!CONFIG_DM) += efi_boot_device_legacy.o"?)
I would do
ifeq ($(CONFIG_DM),y)
obj-y += efi_boot_device_dm.o
else
obj-y += efi_boot_device_nodm.o
endif
Alex
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-25 16:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-21 18:43 [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4] efi_loader: fix disk objects + device-paths Rob Clark
2017-07-21 18:43 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/4] efi: add some more device path structures Rob Clark
2017-07-21 18:43 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/4] efi_loader: add udevice to EFI device-path mapping Rob Clark
2017-07-25 13:57 ` Rob Clark
2017-07-25 16:46 ` Alexander Graf [this message]
2017-07-25 17:05 ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2017-07-21 18:43 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 3/4] efi_loader: make disk objects for partitions Rob Clark
2017-07-23 10:25 ` [U-Boot] [U-Boot, " Heinrich Schuchardt
2017-07-23 19:48 ` Rob Clark
2017-07-21 18:43 ` [U-Boot] [PATCH 4/4] efi_loader: use efi_devpath to get correct boot device-path Rob Clark
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=f2f1bf99-06e9-d8cf-69c0-e25ecf995485@suse.de \
--to=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox