public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joey Oravec <joravec@drewtech.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is plannedtoimproveU-Boot configuration...
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:48:10 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5723h$lmm$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070618203506.DB4E13535E1@atlas.denx.de

"Wolfgang Denk" <wd@denx.de> wrote in message 
news:20070618203506.DB4E13535E1 at atlas.denx.de...
> Please  be  careful  when  planning  for  this.  One  feature  thatis
> essential  to  me is that it must be possible to have all information
> for the configuration of a certain board in  a  single  configuration
> file   (i.   e.   something   corresponding   to   what  we  have  in
> include/config/<board>.h now)

The .config file from kbuild is just a big list of name-value configuration 
values. Each SoC has code for on-chip peripherals, and each board has code 
specific to its soldered components. The main difference should be using 
kbuild for a hierarchical menu configuration instead of one giant include 
file to increase/decrease the size of u-boot.bin. Invariant parameters like 
clock

In an email directly to Carsten I suggested that the first step should be a 
prototype. Right now the main configuation options (CONFIG_LCD) all have 
sub-options (LCD_BPP). Most of them are true/false, some are enumerated 
choices, and some are strings. It should all be possible, but the first step 
is probably to draw the tree of configuration options for at least one 
platform.

Did you have anything in mind for Makefile trickery? The best example I 
could find is TEXT_BASE, and that fits well as a kbuild configuration 
parameter.

-joey 

  reply	other threads:[~2007-06-18 22:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2007-06-14  9:37 [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improve U-Boot configuration Carsten Schlote
2007-06-14 12:24 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improveU-Boot configuration Joey Oravec
2007-06-18 10:42   ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned toimproveU-Boot configuration Carsten Schlote
2007-06-18 20:35     ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-18 22:48       ` Joey Oravec [this message]
2007-06-18 23:06         ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is plannedtoimproveU-Boot configuration Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-19 12:31           ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-06-19 22:58             ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-19 16:37       ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned toimproveU-Boot configuration Carsten Schlote
2007-06-19 23:07         ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-20 14:54           ` Carsten Schlote
2007-06-20 22:34             ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-20 15:47 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improve U-Boot configuration Grant Likely
2007-06-20 16:06   ` Carsten Schlote
2007-06-20 21:05   ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improveU-Boot configuration Ulf Samuelsson
2007-06-20 21:31     ` Stefan Roese

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='f5723h$lmm$1@sea.gmane.org' \
    --to=joravec@drewtech.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox