From: Joey Oravec <joravec@drewtech.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is plannedtoimproveU-Boot configuration...
Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2007 18:48:10 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5723h$lmm$1@sea.gmane.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20070618203506.DB4E13535E1@atlas.denx.de
"Wolfgang Denk" <wd@denx.de> wrote in message
news:20070618203506.DB4E13535E1 at atlas.denx.de...
> Please be careful when planning for this. One feature thatis
> essential to me is that it must be possible to have all information
> for the configuration of a certain board in a single configuration
> file (i. e. something corresponding to what we have in
> include/config/<board>.h now)
The .config file from kbuild is just a big list of name-value configuration
values. Each SoC has code for on-chip peripherals, and each board has code
specific to its soldered components. The main difference should be using
kbuild for a hierarchical menu configuration instead of one giant include
file to increase/decrease the size of u-boot.bin. Invariant parameters like
clock
In an email directly to Carsten I suggested that the first step should be a
prototype. Right now the main configuation options (CONFIG_LCD) all have
sub-options (LCD_BPP). Most of them are true/false, some are enumerated
choices, and some are strings. It should all be possible, but the first step
is probably to draw the tree of configuration options for at least one
platform.
Did you have anything in mind for Makefile trickery? The best example I
could find is TEXT_BASE, and that fits well as a kbuild configuration
parameter.
-joey
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-06-18 22:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-06-14 9:37 [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improve U-Boot configuration Carsten Schlote
2007-06-14 12:24 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improveU-Boot configuration Joey Oravec
2007-06-18 10:42 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned toimproveU-Boot configuration Carsten Schlote
2007-06-18 20:35 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-18 22:48 ` Joey Oravec [this message]
2007-06-18 23:06 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is plannedtoimproveU-Boot configuration Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-19 12:31 ` Jerry Van Baren
2007-06-19 22:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-19 16:37 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned toimproveU-Boot configuration Carsten Schlote
2007-06-19 23:07 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-20 14:54 ` Carsten Schlote
2007-06-20 22:34 ` Wolfgang Denk
2007-06-20 15:47 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improve U-Boot configuration Grant Likely
2007-06-20 16:06 ` Carsten Schlote
2007-06-20 21:05 ` [U-Boot-Users] Some questions about what is planned to improveU-Boot configuration Ulf Samuelsson
2007-06-20 21:31 ` Stefan Roese
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='f5723h$lmm$1@sea.gmane.org' \
--to=joravec@drewtech.com \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox