public inbox for u-boot@lists.denx.de
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Anderson <seanga2@gmail.com>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [PATCH 0/7] riscv: Correctly handle IPIs already pending upon boot
Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2020 22:44:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ff70b2a8-b119-64ef-3533-30fb95828cda@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9b45823d-77e2-bb48-a1d5-cda9221f2b47@gmail.com>

On 9/8/20 10:38 PM, Sean Anderson wrote:
> On 9/8/20 10:02 PM, Rick Chen wrote:
>> Hi Sean
>>
>>> On the K210, the prior stage bootloader does not clear IPIs. This presents
>>> a problem, because U-Boot up until this point assumes (with one exception)
>>> that IPIs are cleared when it starts. This series attempts to fix this in a
>>> robust manner, and fix several concurrency bugs I noticed while fixing
>>> these other areas. Heinrich previously submitted a patch addressing part of
>>> this problem in [1].
>>>
>>> [1] https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/uboot/patch/20200811035648.3284-1-xypron.glpk at gmx.de/
>>>
>>
>> It sounds like that the bootloader does not deal with SMP flow well
>> and jump to u-boot-spl, right ?
>>
>> I have a question that why not try to fix the prior stage bootloader
>> to clear IPIs correctly?
> 
> Because it is a ROM :)

Err, perhaps I should clarify. When I say "prior stage bootloader," I
mean that in the general sense of "anything which comes before U-Boot,"
and not to refer specifically to SPL or TPL. For the k210, this is
something akin to the ZSBL on an fu540.

--Sean

  reply	other threads:[~2020-09-09  2:44 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-07 18:16 [PATCH 0/7] riscv: Correctly handle IPIs already pending upon boot Sean Anderson
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 1/7] Revert "riscv: Clear pending interrupts before enabling IPIs" Sean Anderson
2020-09-09  7:50   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-09 10:23     ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-10  6:39       ` Rick Chen
2020-09-10 10:18         ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-11  7:38   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-11 10:22     ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-11 14:45       ` Bin Meng
2020-09-11 18:30         ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-14  3:10           ` Rick Chen
2020-09-14 12:45             ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 2/7] riscv: Match memory barriers between send_ipi_many and handle_ipi Sean Anderson
2020-09-11  7:45   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 3/7] riscv: Use NULL as a sentinel value for smp_call_function Sean Anderson
2020-09-09  8:33   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-09  9:01     ` Rick Chen
2020-09-09 10:16       ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-09 10:26         ` Heinrich Schuchardt
2020-09-09 10:36           ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-10  8:09         ` Rick Chen
2020-09-14  3:21         ` Rick Chen
2020-09-11  8:04   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-14  1:58     ` Leo Liang
2020-09-14  2:07       ` Bin Meng
2020-09-14  6:10         ` Leo Liang
2020-09-14  6:15           ` Bin Meng
2020-09-14 14:05     ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 4/7] riscv: Clear pending IPIs on initialization Sean Anderson
2020-09-14  2:08   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 5/7] riscv: Add fence to available_harts_lock Sean Anderson
2020-09-10  3:26   ` Rick Chen
2020-09-11 10:39     ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-11 14:47   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 6/7] riscv: Ensure gp is NULL or points to valid data Sean Anderson
2020-09-14  5:25   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-14 13:03     ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-14 13:27       ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-07 18:16 ` [PATCH 7/7] riscv: Add some comments to start.S Sean Anderson
2020-09-14  5:26   ` Bin Meng
2020-09-09  2:02 ` [PATCH 0/7] riscv: Correctly handle IPIs already pending upon boot Rick Chen
2020-09-09  2:38   ` Sean Anderson
2020-09-09  2:44     ` Sean Anderson [this message]
2020-09-10  7:08     ` Rick Chen
2020-09-10 10:49       ` Sean Anderson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ff70b2a8-b119-64ef-3533-30fb95828cda@gmail.com \
    --to=seanga2@gmail.com \
    --cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox