From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: rhabarber1848 <rhabarber1848@web.de>
Date: Tue, 3 Nov 2009 10:17:56 +0000 (UTC)
Subject: [U-Boot] [STATUS] v2009.11-rc1 is out
References: <20091028134210.E72C5E916D6@gemini.denx.de>
	<hcoo6m$ojo$1@ger.gmane.org> <m2vdhsymmy.fsf@ohwell.denx.de>
Message-ID: <hcp00k$shh$1@ger.gmane.org>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi,

Am Tue, 03 Nov 2009 10:37:41 +0100 schrieb Detlev Zundel:

> Grepping through my source, I cannot find such a configuration - do you
> plan to submit this support here sometime?

the code was written by other people and is maintained out-of-uboot-tree 
in our public CVS.

After unpacking U-Boot 2009.08 these files are copied into the source 
tree: http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/boot/u-boot-tuxbox/

Then this patch is applied
http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/cdk/Patches/u-boot-2009.08.diff?view=markup

This is the board config used:
http://cvs.tuxbox.org/tuxbox/cdk/config/u-boot.dbox2.h.m4?view=markup

I do not know if the code meets U-Boot coding standards, but it works ;)
Adding the code to the U-Boot tree makes sense but I think I do not have 
the needed skills to support it in the future.

> Apart from that, I'd strongly start looking for implications of the
> recent rewrite of the relocation strategy to code not in mainline.

Ah, this is the message I was waiting for. After 2009.08 I did not follow 
the coding process due to lack of time so I am sure I missed something. 
Do you mean "[TESTING PATCH] ppc: Relocation test patch" from Sep 12th?
Btw, I am using gcc-3.4.6.

> Apart from that you could also use the information in our DULG[1] for
> debugging of U-Boot after relocation and use gdb

I?ll try this as well.

Cheers, rhabarber1848