[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] TI: DaVinci DA850 EVM: support passing device speed grade information to kernel

[Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>]

Hi Wolfgang,

> Dear Detlev Zundel,
>
> In message <m2hbitgthb.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> you wrote:
>> 
>> > You mean replace "maxspeed" by "cpuclk"? As I have noted a number of times
>> > before, we are not passing the cpu clock speed here. That information kernel
>> > directly reads from system registers. No need to pass it from U-Boot. The
>> > example you are giving is not the right comparison.
>> 
>> Ok, then currently I would vote for "cpumaxspeed_mhz".
>
> Even though its pretty descriptive - for the sake of consistency I
> recommend to omit the "_mhz" part. 

I know that I will mutter a not so nice remark every time I use the
variable and am forced to look up the documentation for a single setenv
command instead of typing 4 more characters.

I still remember the days of "clocks_in_mhz" and the waste of time it
produced - maybe this is why I continue to raise this concern.

> Also, I feel that "clock" would be more appropriate than "speed". And
> we should consider that we already use "cpuclk" for very similar
> purposes in U-Boot.
>
> Can we agree on "cpumaxclk" ?

If nobody else shares my concerncs this sounds good.

Cheers
  Detlev

-- 
#!/usr/bin/perl
$c="print\"\#\!\/usr\/bin\/perl\
\\\$c\=\\\"\"\.quotemeta\(\$c\)\.\"\\\"\;\\n\$c;\"";
print"#!/usr/bin/perl\n\$c=\"".quotemeta($c)."\";\n$c;";
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH,      MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich,  Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de