From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH,V2] JFFS2: accelerate scanning.
Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2011 11:43:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2ei4oc9m9.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTikC6PB98JVd_VSV3Wk2HJV-nhV7sQ@mail.gmail.com> (Baidu Liu's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2011 11:43:37 +0800")
Hi Baidu,
> Hi,Detlev :
>
> 2011/4/19 Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>:
>> Hi Baidu,
>>
>>> ?Syncs up with jffs2 in the linux kernel:
>>> ?1/ Change DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE from 4KB to 256 Bytes.
>>> ?2/ If the 1KB data is 0xFF after the cleanmarker, skip
>>> ?and scan the next sector.
>>> ?3/ Change the buffer size from 4KB to 128KB which is the
>>> ?common size of erase block.
>>
>> There is no "common size of erase block". ?Looking into the Linux code,
>> it uses "max(erase block size, 128k)" for its buffer to speed up reading
>> from NAND and the 128k seem to be a kmalloc limit.
>>
>> So maybe a "increase buffer size from 4KiB to 128KiB to reduce number of
>> read operations" would be more fitting. ?By the way, does this change
>> contribute to the performance increase at all, or is the increase simply
>> due to DEFAULT_EMPTY_SCAN_SIZE?
>>
>
> Yes, I think it is useful to speed up the scanning.
Don't get me wrong, but I was not asking whether you "think" it speeds
up the scanning. When it comes to performance, I learnt to trust
numbers olnly. This may in part be because I myself occassionally was
completely wrong in predicting performance issues.
So I am still eager to see actual numbers if this _really_ speeds up
scanning.
Cheers
Detlev
--
Die meisten schaetzen nicht, was sie verstehen; aber was sie nicht fassen
koennen, verehren sie. Um geschaetzt zu werden, muessen die Sachen Muehe
kosten; daher wird geruehmt, wer nicht verstanden wird.
--- Baltasar Gracian
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-04-27 9:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-04-17 5:06 [U-Boot] [PATCH,V2] JFFS2: accelerate scanning Baidu Liu
2011-04-19 15:15 ` Detlev Zundel
2011-04-24 3:43 ` Baidu Liu
2011-04-27 9:43 ` Detlev Zundel [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2ei4oc9m9.fsf@ohwell.denx.de \
--to=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox