From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de
Subject: [U-Boot] packed attribute problem
Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2010 13:43:01 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m2fwwkq30a.fsf@ohwell.denx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4CA9CC04.5020800@emk-elektronik.de> (Reinhard Meyer's message of "Mon, 04 Oct 2010 14:43:48 +0200")
Hi Reinhard,
[...]
>> Note that this is with GCC 4.2.2. Even GCC 4.0.0 behaves the same, so
>> this is *not* an issue with very recent tool chains.
>
> OK, for directly adressing elements inside a packed struct;
> but the original post said:
>
> "struct xyz {
> int x;
> int y;
> int z[CONST];
> } __attribute__ ((packed));
>
> struct xyz *abc;
> u32 * status_reg = (u32 *)&abc->z[0];
>
> writel(status, status_reg);"
>
> So the "status_reg" pointer is in a completely unrelated (to the packed struct)
> "u32 *" and still the access is done like it was packed. If the
> compiler silently drags that attribute along into the "u32 *"
> THAT is really sick!
I cannot follow why you think this is sick - actually I think this is
clever. GCC "knows" that abc points to a packed struct and it has no
clue on actual values, so it _has to assume_ it is not aligned.
status_reg is initialized as a pointer to a member of this unaligned
pointer and is thus also considered unaligned. Seems perfectly fine to
me.
Cheers
Detlev
--
BUGS:
It is not yet possible to change operating system by writing to
/proc/sys/kernel/ostype.
-- Linux sysctl(2) man page
--
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk & Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-40 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: dzu at denx.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-10-05 11:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-10-04 9:38 [U-Boot] packed attribute problem Vipin Kumar
2010-10-04 10:17 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-04 10:30 ` Vipin Kumar
2010-10-04 10:44 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-04 10:56 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-04 11:01 ` Vipin Kumar
2010-10-04 11:46 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-04 12:29 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-04 12:43 ` Reinhard Meyer
2010-10-04 12:50 ` Balau
2010-10-04 12:58 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-04 13:02 ` [U-Boot] DDR SPD table sywang
2010-10-04 15:56 ` Mike Frysinger
2010-10-04 12:56 ` [U-Boot] packed attribute problem Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-05 3:45 ` Vipin Kumar
2010-10-05 11:43 ` Detlev Zundel [this message]
2010-10-05 18:03 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-07 9:59 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-10-07 16:46 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-07 17:57 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-07 18:52 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-07 19:31 ` Wolfgang Denk
2010-10-07 20:15 ` Scott Wood
2010-10-11 11:32 ` Detlev Zundel
2010-10-11 13:22 ` Balau
2010-10-04 10:57 ` Vipin Kumar
2010-10-04 12:04 ` Wolfgang Denk
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m2fwwkq30a.fsf@ohwell.denx.de \
--to=dzu@denx.de \
--cc=u-boot@lists.denx.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox