From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Detlev Zundel <dzu@denx.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:49:29 +0200
Subject: [U-Boot-Users] Re: Patch to build csope database in the makefile for u-boot-1.1. 3
In-Reply-To: <4A062D477D842B4C8FC48EA5AF2D41F201528016@us-bv-m23.global.tektronix.net>
	(atul sabharwal's message of "Mon, 24 Oct 2005 09:25:28 -0700")
References: <4A062D477D842B4C8FC48EA5AF2D41F201528016@us-bv-m23.global.tektronix.net>
Message-ID: <m2wtk169t2.fsf@sowhat.denx.de>
List-Id: <u-boot.lists.denx.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: u-boot@lists.denx.de

Hi Atul,

> Having an option in the makefile is better than not having anything.
> People may not trigger it if they don't like it.  And the clean
> operation Is harmless.

Yes I completely agree - I was not questioning including a "cscope"
make target I was just trying to point out potential improvements and
the inconsistency with the distclean/clobber targets.

And by the way - from an unknown origin:
     A: Top posters.
     Q: What is the most annoying thing on Usenet?

Cheers
  Detlev

-- 
Emacs seems a more likely candidate  to contain a mail system than the
mail system to contain an Emacs, so this is the way it was done.
                                            -- Bernard S. Greenberg