[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] board: arm: Add support for Broadcom BCM7445D0

[Thomas Fitzsimmons <fitzsim@fitzsim.org>]

Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> writes:

> On 05/10/2018 06:04 AM, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:
>> Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com> writes:
>> 
>>> On 05/06/2018 04:09 AM, Thomas Fitzsimmons wrote:

[...]

>>>> +
>>>> +config BCMSTB_ACCOMMODATE_STBLINUX
>>>> +	bool ""
>>>> +	default y
>>>> +	help
>>>> +	  This prevents U-Boot from adding memory reservations for the
>>>> +          lengths of initramfs and DTB.  Without skipping these,
>>>> +          stblinux's "contiguous memory allocator" (CMA) Linux driver
>>>> +          (cma_driver) will allocate memory ranges smaller than what
>>>> +          are actually available, because it only checks reservation
>>>> +          sizes.  It doesn't check if the reserved range overlaps the
>>>> +          range it allocates.  stblinux also tries to move the DTB to
>>>> +          a lower memory location early in the Linux boot.  If the FIT
>>>> +          image specifies a load address for the initramfs then
>>>> +          sometimes the DTB is moved into the range where the
>>>> +          initramfs image is loaded.  Defining this will mean that
>>>> +          FIT-provided initramfs load addresses are ignored.
>>>
>>> What STB Linux kernel did you observe this with? I am afraid this is
>>> still true about the ranges vs. allocation even in newer kernels, but
>>> that is kind of intented to keep the logic KISS (because it's already
>>> too complicated IMHO).
>> 
>> I investigated the allocation discrepancy and wrote the workaround while
>> we were still using stblinux-3.14.  Since then we've updated to
>> stblinux-4.1 and I've left the workaround enabled, but I haven't
>> investigated its interactions with the newer bmem mechanism.  I should
>> probably revisit this though, with stblinux-4.1 and stblinux-4.9, just
>> to make sure this macro is still useful.
>
> Sounds good, let me know if there is something that does not seem quite
> right, we could fix it.

[...]

In the v3 patch, I keep the FIT's RFS and DTB in-place.  This approach
eliminates the bmem/cma allocation discrepancies.  I compared bmem/cma
dmesg output for stblinux 3.14, 4.1 and 4.9, zImage and ITB builds, on
my eval board, and they're all the same for the same kernel version.
The only thing I noticed is that in 3.14 and 4.1 (zImage and ITB), the
first bmem region is:

   768 MiB at 0x0000000010000000

whereas in 4.9 (zImage and ITB), it is:

   760 MiB at 0x0000000010800000

This is booting with no kernel command line arguments, so I guess some
default may have changed between stblinux 4.1 and 4.9?

Thomas