From: Eric Brower <ebrower@usa.net>
To: ultralinux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Problem with ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, ...)
Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 19:21:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <401AAECA.70609@usa.net> (raw)
The definition of TUNSETIF is:
#define TUNSETIFF _IOW('T', 202, int)
indicating the argument is an "int" rather than a "struct ifreq*". This
trickery (as I understand it) would work on 32-bit systems, but not
64-bit.
The .../arch/sparc64/kernel/ioctl32.c translation for this ioctl is
"COMPATIBLE_IOCTL" which would be correct if an int was really expected,
but is not correct when a struct ifreq* is passed. There are already
translations in ioctl32.c to deal with an argument of type struct
ifreq*, so you might wish to take a look at them and change the
COMPATIBLE_IOCTL entry to an appropriate HANDLE_IOCTL entry. Take a
look at dev_ifsioc() for starters.
I've cc'd the ultralinux list, which is more appropriate for this matter.
E
Erwann Abalea wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I wanted to install OpenVPN on my firewall machine (an Ultra1 running
> 2.4.18), but unfortunately, I failed.
>
> I managed to track the failing code, and tried to find equivalent
> known-to-be-good code (found in the Linux Kernel documentation, in
> networking/tuntap.txt).
>
> The following code fails:
> -----
> int tun_alloc(char *dev)
> {
> struct ifreq ifr;
> int fd, err;
>
> if ((fd = open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR)) < 0)
> {
> perror("Unable to open /dev/net/tun");
> return -1;
> }
>
> memset(&ifr, 0, sizeof(ifr));
>
> /* Flags: IFF_TUN - TUN device (no Ethernet headers)
> * IFF_TAP - TAP device
> * IFF_NO_PI - Do not provide packet information
> */
> ifr.ifr_flags = IFF_TUN;
>
> if (*dev)
> strncpy(ifr.ifr_name, dev, IFNAMSIZ);
>
> if ((err = ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, (void *) &ifr)) < 0)
> {
> close(fd);
> perror("ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, ...) error");
> return err;
> }
> strcpy(dev, ifr.ifr_name);
> return fd;
> }
> -----
>
> I tested this in a small program (just add a main() asking for an
> argument, and call the tun_alloc() with the given argument). It fails on 2
> ultrasparc machines (an U1 and an U2 running the same kernel version, the
> U1 also has the IPVS patch applied), and works on a standard PC also
> running the 2.4.18 kernel. Tun/Tap support is compiled in (if it wasn't,
> the failure would have been at the open() call).
>
> What I get is:
> -----
> Opening tun0
> ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, ...) error: : Invalid argument
> -----
>
> I also get something in my syslog.log file:
> Jan 30 15:15:39 herisson kernel: sys32_ioctl(tun:4329): Unknown cmd fd(3) cmd(800454ca) arg(effffc70)
>
> What am I doing wrong?
>
next reply other threads:[~2004-01-30 19:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-01-30 19:21 Eric Brower [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-02 0:12 Problem with ioctl(fd, TUNSETIFF, ...) David S. Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=401AAECA.70609@usa.net \
--to=ebrower@usa.net \
--cc=ultralinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox