From: Demi Marie Obenour <demiobenour@gmail.com>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Ensuring that mount(8) will always interpret a filesystem correctly
Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2024 00:11:49 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <114fa16d-5908-4300-96a0-23203c7470af@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <zxqdvuyhtmas5apcnop7kleh2b24sboscyaosgkyqqfz4nlsdf@rmgdzivamwdw>
On 12/9/24 5:26 AM, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> Hi Demi,
>
> On Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 08:45:32PM GMT, Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>> Is there a guarantee that if all data before the filesystem superblock is
>> zero, and that the filesystem never writes to this region, libblkid (and
>> thus, presumably, mount(8)) will always mount the filesystem with the
>> correct filesystem type, even if e.g. someone writes a file containing
>> a superblock of a different filesystem and the filesystem happens to put
>> it where that superblock is valid?
>
> the libblkid library offers multiple modes, with "safe mode" being the
> default for detecting filesystems. In this mode, the library checks
> for any additional valid superblocks on the device. There are
> exceptions for certain filesystems on CD/DVD media (such as udf and
> iso), but for regular filesystems, sharing the same device is not
> allowed.
>
> There is also an option to specify that a superblock is only valid if
> no other area is using it (using blkid_probe_set_wiper() and
> blkid_probe_use_wiper()). However, this is only used for LVM and
> bcache.
>
> The library does not require that there are zeros before the
> superblock, as not all mkfs-like programs zero out all areas.
>
> In recent years, there have been no reports of collisions. In the
> entire history of the library, the only collisions I can recall are
> with swap areas and luks, and occasionally with poorly detected FAT
> filesystems (due to the messy design of FAT).
Was https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1305 a
collision between ZFS and ext4?
>> The motivation for this message is that systemd-gpt-generator generates
>> mountpoints based on Discoverable Partition Specification GUIDs. These
>> indicate the mountpoint of the partition but not the filesystem type.
>
> Filesystem auto-detection is a common feature. The situation is
> similar to having an "auto" fstype in fstab. The systemd-gpt-generator
> simply identifies the partition as "/usr" (or any other mountpoint)
> and the rest is usual scenario.>
>> If a correctly-produced filesystem image will always continue to be
>> recognized as the correct type, this is fine. Otherwise, an unlucky
>> combination of writes to the filesystem and filesystem allocation decisions
>> could cause the filesystem to start being mounted as the wrong type, which
>> would be very bad. According to https://github.com/util-linux/util-linux/issues/1305,
>> libblkid can indeed probe for subsequent superblocks after the first one it
>> finds.
>
> I believe the situation would be the same even without the
> Discoverable Partition Specification. The kernel always divides the
> whole disk into partitions, and libblkid/mount utilizes these
> partitions. Therefore, the filesystems are automatically separated by
> the partition table.
/etc/fstab provides an explicit filesystem type. The Discoverable
Partition Specification doesn't.
--
Sincerely,
Demi Marie Obenour (she/her/hers)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-12-10 5:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-08 1:45 Ensuring that mount(8) will always interpret a filesystem correctly Demi Marie Obenour
2024-12-09 10:26 ` Karel Zak
2024-12-10 5:11 ` Demi Marie Obenour [this message]
2024-12-10 11:16 ` Karel Zak
2024-12-10 23:28 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2024-12-11 13:38 ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-12-14 22:08 ` Demi Marie Obenour
2024-12-15 3:20 ` Theodore Ts'o
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=114fa16d-5908-4300-96a0-23203c7470af@gmail.com \
--to=demiobenour@gmail.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox