From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mail-wg0-f48.google.com ([74.125.82.48]:34120 "EHLO mail-wg0-f48.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751231AbaEXLIV (ORCPT ); Sat, 24 May 2014 07:08:21 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k14so1651435wgh.19 for ; Sat, 24 May 2014 04:08:20 -0700 (PDT) From: Sami Kerola To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Cc: kerolasa@iki.fi Subject: [PATCH 0/4] setterm: documentation updates Date: Sat, 24 May 2014 12:08:12 +0100 Message-Id: <1400929696-12548-1-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On 20 May 2014 11:02, Karel Zak wrote: > BTW, setterm still need our love: Hi Karel and others, Here is the remaining setterm(1) love before release 2.25. > * usage() contains only options, but no any description In this patch set, see 0001. > * it would be nice to have long options (--term rather than -term) > in the man page Hold on, do you mean what I did in commit fb27f91cac9702ad1858d782dd840d5868547423 > * nowhere (in man page) is info that --long options are supported > since v2.25 (and for backward compatibility is better to use > "-foo" rather than "--foo") In this patch set, see 0003. Sami Kerola (4): setterm: add usage() descriptions docs: setterm.1 add missing options to manual page and remove duplicate docs: setterm.1 add options compatibility note docs: setterm.1 clean up manual page groff style term-utils/setterm.1 | 291 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ term-utils/setterm.c | 69 ++++++------ 2 files changed, 222 insertions(+), 138 deletions(-) -- 1.9.3