From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.22]:59135 "EHLO mout.gmx.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751818AbaE2AxV (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 May 2014 20:53:21 -0400 Received: from tenfore.ga-group.nl ([77.12.144.175]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx001) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LoEwL-1WNNeo1KcT-00gDrm for ; Thu, 29 May 2014 02:53:19 +0200 From: Ruediger Meier To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH] setarch question, uname -m Date: Thu, 29 May 2014 02:53:17 +0200 Message-Id: <1401324798-15059-1-git-send-email-sweet_f_a@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <201405270134.29753.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> References: <201405270134.29753.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ruediger Meier I just send a patch proposal to let "setarch $(uname -m) ..." work everywhere. Tested on several arm flavours. If this makes no sense please tell me. Then I would fix our setarch test for non-hardcoded archs. Ruediger Meier (1): setarch, add generic support for setarch $(uname -m) ... sys-utils/setarch.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+) -- 1.8.4.5