From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from out3-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:36166 "EHLO out3-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752455AbbCOP0q (ORCPT ); Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:26:46 -0400 Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B57F207D2 for ; Sun, 15 Mar 2015 11:26:44 -0400 (EDT) Message-Id: <1426433205.3225343.240610937.5D55876F@webmail.messagingengine.com> From: Benno Schulenberg To: J William Piggott Cc: Karel Zak , "Util-Linux" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain In-Reply-To: <550337F0.3050100@gmx.com> References: <5503364E.6010302@gmx.com> <550337F0.3050100@gmx.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] hwclock: remove depreciated ntpdate Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2015 16:26:45 +0100 Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Mar 13, 2015, at 20:18, J William Piggott wrote: > Replace references to the depreciated ntpdate with sntp. s/depreciated/deprecated/ > -.BR \%ntpdate\ \-q " , or " \%date\ \-Ins > +.BR \%sntp ", or " \%date\ \-Ins Hmm, maybe it's a bit to early to delete the mention of ntpdate? My fairly recent Linux Mint doesn't have sntp yet. Maybe add sntp to the list instead of replacing ntpdate? Oh, in the previous patch you used an inconsistent capital in the subject line. And the same s/system/system's/ applies. Benno -- http://www.fastmail.com - Accessible with your email software or over the web