From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org, ebiederm@xmission.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nsenter: fix ability to enter unprivileged containers
Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2016 13:28:15 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1461000495.7385.18.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160418171103.lcbrxvaldcyhemd3@ws.net.home>
On Mon, 2016-04-18 at 19:11 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:37:34AM -0400, James Bottomley wrote:
> > OK, so if you want me to reply properly, you're going to have to keep
> > my address in the cc list.
> >
> > > > If you enter it first, you lose privilege for subsequent
> > > namespace
> > > > enters,see issue
> > > >
> > > > https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/issues/315
> > > >
> > > > The fix is to enter the user namespace last of all.
> > >
> > > I verified that with *current*/unpatched nsenter,
> > >
> > > $ unshare -rm sleep inf &
> > > $ nsenter -t $! -U -m --preserve
> > >
> > > works as expected (from regular user [and with unprivileged userns
> > > enabled]).
> > >
> > > With this patch it *won't* work [verified], of course (as you'll need
> > > root privileges in userns before joining mount-ns, and you can only
> > > obtain them by entering userns first).
> >
> > So we're using userns for different things. I'm using it to remove
> > privilege (so on my userns implementation root in the host enters but
> > on becoming root in the userns, it can do nothing other than write to
> > its own files) and you're using it to enhance privilege. It looks like
> > these two things will always be mutually exclusive, so perhaps we need
> > an extra flag to nsenter to say do the userns first or last?
>
> That's what I have talked about at github -- see Eric's comment in the
> code, the user NS is the first in the array for a good reason. May be
> it would be really better to add --user-{first,last} options to
> specify when you want to enter user NS.
OK, I'll code this up; hang on.
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-18 17:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-18 12:26 [PATCH] nsenter: fix ability to enter unprivileged containers James Bottomley
2016-04-18 14:33 ` Yuriy M. Kaminskiy
2016-04-18 15:51 ` Yuriy M. Kaminskiy
2016-04-18 15:37 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-18 15:50 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-18 17:11 ` Karel Zak
2016-04-18 17:28 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2016-04-18 18:26 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-04-18 20:56 ` James Bottomley
2016-04-18 21:31 ` Eric W. Biederman
2016-04-22 9:05 ` Karel Zak
2016-04-18 19:40 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1461000495.7385.18.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
--to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox