From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
To: Paul Fox <pgf@laptop.org>
Cc: Daniel Drake <dsd@laptop.org>, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org, Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@vrfy.org>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] evstate: new utility for querying evdev key/switch/event state
Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:35:41 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201107121335.41556.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15489.1310501220@foxharp.boston.ma.us>
On Tuesday, July 12, 2011 01:07:00 PM Paul Fox wrote:
> daniel wrote:
> > On 11 July 2011 17:39, Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > > Now I'd say that this utility probably better fit into linuxconsole
> > > project with the rest of input-related utilities...
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/linuxconsole/ ?
> >
> > This must have been what you were referring to before. Yes, this
> > looks like a more appropriate home. I'll take it in that direction.
>
> i disagree. the contents of that package seems to be mostly for
> testing and legacy support. access to the state of input switches in
> a generic way seems far more generally useful than that.
>
> i would rather not see the sysfs state variable go away in the first
> place -- it's too convenient to use, and inexpensive to implement --
> needing an ioctl for this seems like a step backwards. but barring
> that, relegating the evstate functionality to linuxconsole seems wrong.
> (for instance, i don't think the OLPC laptop distros have a need for
> any of the other utilities in linuxconsole.)
You can package only what you need from it, no need to package everything.
--
Dmitry
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-07-12 20:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-07-09 13:20 [PATCH] evstate: new utility for querying evdev key/switch/event state Daniel Drake
2011-07-11 12:18 ` Karel Zak
2011-07-11 13:12 ` Daniel Drake
2011-07-11 13:14 ` Daniel Drake
2011-07-11 16:39 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2011-07-11 16:48 ` Daniel Drake
2011-07-12 20:07 ` Paul Fox
2011-07-12 20:35 ` Dmitry Torokhov [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201107121335.41556.dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--to=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=dsd@laptop.org \
--cc=kay.sievers@vrfy.org \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pgf@laptop.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox