From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:44674 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751236Ab1HPMdR (ORCPT ); Tue, 16 Aug 2011 08:33:17 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 14:33:13 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Benno Schulenberg Cc: Util-Linux Subject: Re: [patches] small fixes to some help texts and man pages Message-ID: <20110816123313.GB14535@nb.net.home> References: <1313434832.3403.140258129904445@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1313434832.3403.140258129904445@webmail.messagingengine.com> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:00:32PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Attached bunch of patches correct some small mistakes in some > help texts and man pages, and additionally make several small > improvements in wording and formatting. They also slice up some > help texts into small chunks, to make things easier to handle for > translators. Good idea. Thanks. > In the source tree there are two mount.c files: mount/mount.c > and libmount/samples/mount.c. Is the latter a future replacement > of the first? Or is it a version that can already be used instead of > the former one? If both are valid versions, then the sixth patch > should not be applied and the seventh yes. If the mount.c in > libmount/ is just sample code or a future replacement, then > please apply the sixth patch (although you may want to change > the actual mechanism of the exclusion). All applied :-) The libmount/sample/mount.c is a future replacement. It's good idea to ignore */samples/* directories. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com