From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:29460 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751570Ab2ATOUF (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Jan 2012 09:20:05 -0500 Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 23:20:02 +0900 (JST) Message-Id: <20120120.232002.849876084731555262.yamato@redhat.com> To: kzak@redhat.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not From: Masatake YAMATO In-Reply-To: <20120120140444.GC13157@x2.net.home> References: <20120120140444.GC13157@x2.net.home> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > > I'd like to add support for /etc/fstab.d to libmount. The library is > currently used by mount, umount and mount.nfs. The goal is to use it > on more places. > > The /etc/fstab.d directory has been requested by people who maintains > large number of mountpoints etc. > > The directory is not replacement for /etc/fstab, it's additional place > where you can describe your filesystems. > > The disadvantage is that the stuff in the directory will be invisible > for some tools (udisks, systemd, ...), so I have very vocal > disagreement from some people who don't want to see /etc/fstab.d at all. I'm working on systemd to support /etc/fstab.d. Masatake YAMATO