From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@googlemail.com>
Cc: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: /etc/fstab.d yes or not
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2012 18:47:17 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120120184716.GB23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAK1hOcNget=-MjeejiYGo5Vkigq9ey1o7sD2peO+tDGdk3TU9g@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 07:20:33PM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com> wrote:
> > ?BTW, systemd allows to define addition mountpoints in
> > ?systemd.mount(5) unit file(s), so we already have additional place
> > ?for fstab stuff...
>
> systemd needs a large blunt object be stuck into its eye.
>
> systemd was supposed to be an init replacement.
> Its continuing attempts to infiltrate entire system
> are very worrying.
I'm not saying I like /etc/foo.d/* (hell, sed in post-install is not
a big deal; not for fstab, not for inetd.conf, etc.), but yes,
complaints about changes that make life somewhat more difficult for
systemd are rather hypocritical, what with the embrace-and-extend
games they are playing.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-20 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-20 14:04 /etc/fstab.d yes or not Karel Zak
2012-01-20 14:20 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-20 14:56 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 15:57 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 16:08 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-24 0:19 ` Boaz Harrosh
2012-01-24 9:47 ` bastien ROUCARIES
2012-01-20 14:43 ` Attila Kinali
2012-01-20 14:59 ` Karel Zak
2012-01-20 15:03 ` Voelker, Bernhard
2012-01-20 15:20 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 15:49 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 16:13 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 16:22 ` Roger Leigh
2012-01-20 17:59 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 12:21 ` Karel Zak
2012-01-23 13:01 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-23 13:03 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 13:26 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-23 13:37 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 14:14 ` Masatake YAMATO
2012-01-23 14:32 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-23 13:55 ` Theodore Tso
2012-01-23 22:07 ` Alan Cox
2012-01-24 1:06 ` Ted Ts'o
2012-01-20 18:20 ` Denys Vlasenko
2012-01-20 18:29 ` Kay Sievers
2012-01-20 18:47 ` Al Viro [this message]
2012-01-24 11:02 ` /etc/fstab.d yes or not (resolved) Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120120184716.GB23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vda.linux@googlemail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).