From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:51788 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752791Ab2AYJhL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:37:11 -0500 Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2012 10:37:04 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: Davidlohr Bueso Cc: Vic Abell , util-linux Subject: Re: adopting lslk Message-ID: <20120125093704.GC28644@x2.net.home> References: <1327445685.3650.4.camel@offbook> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1327445685.3650.4.camel@offbook> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:54:45PM +0100, Davidlohr Bueso wrote: > I just noticed this big fat message from the lslk(8) manpage: > > Revision 1.29 represents the end of life for lslk. I don't have time > to support it. Please don't report bugs to me. I will politely > decline to work on them. Yes, I know, I'm maintainer of the package in Red Hat :-) > I was thinking util-linux might be a good place to continue maintaining I agree. > this program, it seems worthwhile. I couldn't find the _official_ source > tarball but I got it through apt. I could integrate it and send a patch. > Any thoughts? Yes, but please clean up the code, add xalloc, err.h, long options, etc... you know ;-) May be it would be also nice to use lib/tt.c for output to make it compatible with our new utils. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com