From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:13425 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751299Ab2B1OMg (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Feb 2012 09:12:36 -0500 Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2012 15:12:26 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] conifigure: add a crosscompile path for scanf_cv_alloc_modifier Message-ID: <20120228141226.GC22034@x2.net.home> References: <1330103768-32139-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1330103768-32139-1-git-send-email-bigeasy@linutronix.de> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 06:16:07PM +0100, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote: > This allows to building the package cross again. Since the return value > is not used I guess there is little loss. > > Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior > --- > configure.ac | 2 ++ > 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index d3b298c..c27e890 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -387,6 +387,8 @@ AC_CACHE_VAL([scanf_cv_alloc_modifier], > [scanf_cv_alloc_modifier=as], > [scanf_cv_alloc_modifier=no] > ) > + , > + [scanf_cv_alloc_modifier=no] > ) > ) Applied, thanks. ...but it means that you will compile the package without libmount. Is it expected? In the next release fsck will depend on the library, we have new mount and umount, .... Is it really true that your glibc is without %as / %ms ? Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com