From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:2174 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751083Ab2C3PFB (ORCPT ); Fri, 30 Mar 2012 11:05:01 -0400 Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 17:04:57 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: kerolasa@gmail.com Cc: util-linux Subject: Re: [pull] chkdupexe, a bug, version numbers and bashisms Message-ID: <20120330150457.GE23437@x2.net.home> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Merged, but On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 08:27:01PM +0100, Sami Kerola wrote: > Sami Kerola (31): > chkdupexe: reimplement command in C please, send the new chkdupexe to mailing list for review. > addpart: align with util-linux coding standards > delpart: align with util-linux coding standards Fixed... if ((fd = open(argv[1], O_RDONLY)) < 0) err(EXIT_FAILURE, "%s", argv[1]); ... err(EXIT_FAILURE, "BLKPG"); "%s", "BLKPG" are not usable error messages. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com