util-linux.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Bernhard Voelker <mail@bernhard-voelker.de>
Cc: kerolasa@gmail.com, util-linux@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: v2.22-rc2 wish list
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2012 13:15:50 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120727111550.GA29738@x2.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <501271D2.8090708@bernhard-voelker.de>

On Fri, Jul 27, 2012 at 12:47:46PM +0200, Bernhard Voelker wrote:
> On 07/27/2012 12:31 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
> >  Maybe, but many of the tests requires root permissions and it's
> >  designed for developers only. I'd like to avoid situations when the
> >  tests are executed with root permissions by automatic distro build
> >  systems etc.
> 
> Why? The more folks run the tests, the more bugs can be reported and fixed.
> What's wrong about the tests? And if there's something wrong: shouldn't
> they not be made more robust?
> 
> E.g. coreutils also has many tests which "require_root", and I think
> it's safe to run these tests.

Does the tests modify /etc/fstab, mount another filesystems and
initialize scsi_debug, loop and raid devices?

I have experience that some distros and end-users rebuild packages
as superuser. I don't want to be responsible for possible problems on
the target systems.

    Karel

-- 
 Karel Zak  <kzak@redhat.com>
 http://karelzak.blogspot.com

  reply	other threads:[~2012-07-27 11:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-07-27  8:10 v2.22-rc2 wish list Karel Zak
2012-07-27  8:26 ` Sami Kerola
2012-07-27 10:31   ` Karel Zak
2012-07-27 10:47     ` Bernhard Voelker
2012-07-27 11:15       ` Karel Zak [this message]
2012-07-27 11:44         ` Bernhard Voelker
2012-07-27 13:13           ` Davidlohr Bueso
2012-07-27 20:27             ` Karel Zak
2012-07-30 16:37           ` Karel Zak
2012-07-31  5:21             ` Bernhard Voelker
     [not found]     ` <5012B7B4.8070001@gmail.com>
2012-07-27 17:59       ` Bruce Dubbs

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120727111550.GA29738@x2.net.home \
    --to=kzak@redhat.com \
    --cc=kerolasa@gmail.com \
    --cc=mail@bernhard-voelker.de \
    --cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).