From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from vint.altlinux.org ([194.107.17.35]:53523 "EHLO vint.altlinux.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1945923Ab2KNXKd (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Nov 2012 18:10:33 -0500 Received: from wo.int.altlinux.org (wo.int.altlinux.org [192.168.1.4]) by vint.altlinux.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE4B7226C099 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 23:10:31 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2012 03:10:31 +0400 From: "Dmitry V. Levin" To: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: new mount regression Message-ID: <20121114231031.GB20303@altlinux.org> References: <50A3F95E.6030407@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE" In-Reply-To: <50A3F95E.6030407@gmail.com> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:04:46AM +0400, Alexey Gladkov wrote: > Greetings! >=20 > I found that mount no longer understands fstype list in the /etc/fstab > after the migration to libmount: >=20 > $ dd if=3D/dev/zero of=3D/tmp/disk bs=3D1M count=3D10 > $ losetup /dev/loop0 /tmp/disk > $ mkfs.ext3 /dev/loop0 > $ grep loop0 /etc/fstab > /dev/loop0 /media vfat,hfsplus,ext4,ext3,ext2 defaults 0 0 >=20 > $ mount /media > mount: unknown filesystem type 'vfat,hfsplus,ext4,ext3,ext2' >=20 > But if we use deprecated mount: >=20 > $ ./mount.deprecated -v /media > /dev/loop0 on /media type ext4 (rw) >=20 > Also new mount understands fstype list in options: >=20 > $ mount -t vfat,hfsplus,ext4,ext3,ext2 /dev/loop0 /media Already reported with a patch in http://marc.info/?l=3Dutil-linux-ng&m=3D134876452206541 The patch was labelled a hack and rejected in http://marc.info/?l=3Dutil-linux-ng&m=3D134910609108013 but no better alternative is available so far. Please apply that patch in Sisyphus until upstream has a better fix for this regression. --=20 ldv --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlCkJOcACgkQfKvmrJ41Nh5UqgCgmL9Hg1IlK8K0+/C7qwq5anRX hxYAn2yclXctqu+27Nj4j/I+SNlBwAbQ =bMLO -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --xXmbgvnjoT4axfJE--