From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:36087 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753379Ab2LSNyl (ORCPT ); Wed, 19 Dec 2012 08:54:41 -0500 Date: Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:54:30 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: Sami Kerola Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] docs: fsck(8), mkfs(8): update manual references Message-ID: <20121219135430.GD17959@x2.net.home> References: <1355654642-22106-1-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> <1355654642-22106-15-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1355654642-22106-15-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:44:02AM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote: > .SH SEE ALSO > .BR fstab (5), > .BR mkfs (8), > -.BR fsck.ext2 (8) > -or > -.BR fsck.ext3 (8) > -or > .BR e2fsck (8), > -.BR cramfsck (8), > -.BR fsck.minix (8), > -.BR fsck.msdos (8), > +.BR e2fsck.conf (5), > +.BR jfs_fsck (8), > +.BR jfs_fscklog (8), Everything other than fsck. (mkfs., mount.) is wrong and invisible for the regular system tools. The question is if we really need the references to the filesystem specific fsck man pages (the list of supported filesystems is disto specific) ... why jfs, why not xfs, etc. Maybe it would be better to add a note that "description for the filesystem specific fsck programs is possible to found in fsck.(8) man pages where is filesystem name". Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com