From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53190 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753255Ab3AJJ0C (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Jan 2013 04:26:02 -0500 Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:25:51 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: Sami Kerola Cc: util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] ipcmk: allow user to create more ipc resources at a time Message-ID: <20130110092551.GA1729@x2.net.home> References: <1357760216-4068-1-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> <1357760216-4068-3-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1357760216-4068-3-git-send-email-kerolasa@iki.fi> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 09, 2013 at 07:36:55PM +0000, Sami Kerola wrote: > There is no reason why 'ipcmk -Q -Q' would should not work, so allow that > and any other combination of switches such as: Well, we can implement whatever, but does it make sense? How many people look for the feature? > ipcmk -Q -Q -p 700 -M 42 -Q -S 13 > > The behavior of '-p' changed in this commit. Unacceptable, backwardly incompatible change. Sami, if you want to help then try to write tests, many many utils and features are still not covered by regression tests (hexdump, lsblk, ipc*, dmesg, blockdev, utmpdump, tailf, ....). Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com