From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:10341 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753949Ab3CTNLp (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Mar 2013 09:11:45 -0400 Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2013 14:11:39 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: Benno Schulenberg Cc: Util-Linux , Davidlohr Bueso Subject: Re: [patches] a bunch of man-page fixes, plus -V for blkid Message-ID: <20130320131139.GE14833@x2.net.home> References: <1363639067.25811.140661206020553.0C776E64@webmail.messagingengine.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1363639067.25811.140661206020553.0C776E64@webmail.messagingengine.com> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 09:37:47PM +0100, Benno Schulenberg wrote: > Attached bunch of patches mainly normalizes the formatting of the All applied, thanks. > man pages in the misc-utils directory. The second patch adds -V for > --version to the blkid command (instead of just -v). And the seventh > patch makes the section AVAILABILITY always be the last one in all > man pages. > > CC'ing Davidlohr because the sixth patch touches the man page of > his lslocks command. This man page makes a reference to chmod(1), > but on my machine chmod(1) does not say anything about lock files, > nor anything about being mandatory or advisory -- only fcntl(2) does. > So I have changed that reference, but am unsure whether this is > okay. The man page also referes to lockf(2), but on my machine > there is only a lockf(3); so I've changed that one too, but again am > unsure whether it is okay. Davidlohr? Heh.. where is David, that's the question :-) Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com