From: Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de>
To: kerolasa@gmail.com
Cc: "util-linux" <util-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: last: please review -F and --time-format
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 22:26:36 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201405082226.36617.sweet_f_a@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAG27Bk0fWizWdEhQQUxQNVHp+SsM71qZwqgXgXbhVKxBZkmY+g@mail.gmail.com>
On Thursday 08 May 2014, Sami Kerola wrote:
> On 7 May 2014 15:31, Ruediger Meier <sweet_f_a@gmx.de> wrote:
> > IMO -F and --time-format=xxx need some review/cleanup regarding
> > logout times "still running" and "gone - no logout".
> >
> > Is there any reason why -F and --time-format=full
> > look different? --time-format=notime looks ugly too.
> >
> > See the all the cases here:
> > ------------
> > for opt in -F --time-format=full --time-format=iso
> > --time-format=short --time-format=notime; do echo "### $opt ###"
> > ./last -f ../tests/ts/last/wtmp.LE $opt | grep "running\| no
> > logout" done
> >
> > ### -F ###
> > torvalds linux hobby Mon Aug 26 02:57:08 1991
> > gone - no logout reboot system boot system-name Wed Aug 28
> > 20:00:00 2013 still running ### --time-format=full ###
> > torvalds linux hobby Mon Aug 26 02:57:08 1991
> > gone - no logout reboot system boot
> > system-name Wed Aug 28 20:00:00 2013 still
> > running ### --time-format=iso ###
> > torvalds linux hobby 1991-08-26T02:57:08+0200
> > gone - no logout reboot system boot system-name
> > 2013-08-28T20:00:00+0200 still running ### --time-format=short
> > ###
> > torvalds linux hobby Mon Aug 26 02:57 gone -
> > no logout reboot system boot system-name Wed Aug 28 20:00
> > still running ### --time-format=notime ###
> > torvalds linux hobby - no logout
> > reboot system boot system-name running
>
> Hi Ruediger,
>
> The alignment makes sense when you look the printout where there are
> sessions that are still present, no logout, and logged out.
Yes but I wondered why is there a difference between "full" and -F
while "iso" behaves equally to -F.
> In
> --time-format=full the hyphen in front of 'no logout' does look a bit
> silly. If it really bothers you send a patch.
That's a bit ugly to fix without more refactoring. I've tried here to
address both issues:
https://github.com/karelzak/util-linux/pull/73
cu,
Rudi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-05-08 20:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-07 14:31 last: please review -F and --time-format Ruediger Meier
2014-05-08 8:46 ` Sami Kerola
2014-05-08 20:26 ` Ruediger Meier [this message]
2014-05-12 10:25 ` Karel Zak
2014-05-12 11:01 ` Ruediger Meier
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201405082226.36617.sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--to=sweet_f_a@gmx.de \
--cc=kerolasa@gmail.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox