From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:23948 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753336AbaGUIKM (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jul 2014 04:10:12 -0400 Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 10:10:03 +0200 From: Karel Zak To: Minchan Kim Cc: Davidlohr Bueso , Timofey Titovets , util-linux@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [RFC] Zram handle util Message-ID: <20140721081003.GC17373@x2.net.home> References: <53CAAAB6.6020607@gmail.com> <1405888608.11927.11.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net> <20140721075721.GC8180@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <20140721075721.GC8180@gmail.com> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 07:57:21AM +0000, Minchan Kim wrote: > First of all, Thanks for your effor, Timofey! > > Adding such userspace tool in kernel src directory doesn't make sense. > If we wanted it, there are tons of user tools in kernel src directory > so IMHO, util-linux is better place. I don't think that regular (non-debugging, non-development) userspace utils belong to the kernel tree... Please, see the howtos recommended by Sami and send a patch(es) with the code and a man page. It (util-linux specific details) does not have to be perfect, the important is to have correctly implemented zram specific things. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com