From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
To: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
Cc: kerolasa@gmail.com, Util-Linux <util-linux@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: hwclock --compare segfaults when run as normal user
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:12:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20140728111214.GI8533@x2.net.home> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1406390709.8686.145937949.0F0BF57C@webmail.messagingengine.com>
On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 06:05:09PM +0200, Benno Schulenberg wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 26, 2014, at 16:48, Sami Kerola wrote:
> > On 26 July 2014 13:40, Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net> wrote:
> > > On my system there is no /etc/adjtime file, and then:
> > >
> > > $ ./hwclock --compare
> > > Segmentation fault
> >
> > I tried to reproduce the issue without success. If you have core file
because you have RTC and Benno has cmos I guess
> > could you try to gdb backtrace it?
>
> (gdb) run --compare
> Starting program: /home/ben/util-linux-2.25/hwclock --compare
>
> Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
> 0x0804cf71 in outb () at /usr/include/sys/io.h:99
> 99 __asm__ __volatile__ ("outb %b0,%w1": :"a" (__value), "Nd" (__port));
>
> (gdb) bt
> #0 0x0804cf71 in outb () at /usr/include/sys/io.h:99
> #1 cmos_read () at sys-utils/hwclock-cmos.c:348
> #2 atomic () at sys-utils/hwclock-cmos.c:307
> #3 hclock_read () at sys-utils/hwclock-cmos.c:456
I have no way how to to test it, but can you try the patch below?
Karel
>From 8fe55779b04e961d9e99bba7e1df382b71b63095 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2014 13:00:54 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] hwclock: check for permissions before use clock interface
Reported-by: Benno Schulenberg <bensberg@justemail.net>
Signed-off-by: Karel Zak <kzak@redhat.com>
---
sys-utils/hwclock.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/sys-utils/hwclock.c b/sys-utils/hwclock.c
index a934ace..474e04f 100644
--- a/sys-utils/hwclock.c
+++ b/sys-utils/hwclock.c
@@ -1495,6 +1495,9 @@ static int compare_clock (const bool utc, const bool local_opt)
bool hclock_valid = FALSE, universal, first_pass = TRUE;
int rc;
+ if (ur->get_permissions())
+ return EX_NOPERM;
+
/* dummy call for increased precision */
gettimeofday(&tv, NULL);
@@ -1893,7 +1896,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
}
if (!(show | set | systohc | hctosys | systz | adjust | getepoch
- | setepoch | predict))
+ | setepoch | predict | compare))
show = 1; /* default to show */
if (getuid() == 0)
--
1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-07-28 11:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-07-26 12:40 hwclock --compare segfaults when run as normal user Benno Schulenberg
2014-07-26 14:48 ` Sami Kerola
2014-07-26 16:05 ` Benno Schulenberg
2014-07-28 11:12 ` Karel Zak [this message]
2014-07-28 18:50 ` Benno Schulenberg
2014-07-29 6:27 ` Karel Zak
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20140728111214.GI8533@x2.net.home \
--to=kzak@redhat.com \
--cc=bensberg@justemail.net \
--cc=kerolasa@gmail.com \
--cc=util-linux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox