From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:60659 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751141AbaJ0KzT (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Oct 2014 06:55:19 -0400 Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2014 11:55:09 +0100 From: Karel Zak To: JWP Cc: Benno Schulenberg , Util-Linux Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] hwclock: clean up message periods/full stops Message-ID: <20141027105509.GA20334@x2.net.home> References: <5449BE57.9040203@gmx.com> <1414150431.840372.182833341.74402120@webmail.messagingengine.com> <544A4817.3070406@gmx.com> <20141024125939.GD10134@x2.net.home> <544A795B.8090301@gmx.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <544A795B.8090301@gmx.com> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 12:07:55PM -0400, JWP wrote: > "I prefer refactoring if possible than write things from scratch. And > for hwclock it's really critical to do the changes in small testable > steps." > > I thought you wanted all the small steps submitted and tested in progress. It's better to do all in separate branch, believe me, it's more simple for you and it save our time. Karel -- Karel Zak http://karelzak.blogspot.com