From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: from resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net ([96.114.154.165]:37297 "EHLO resqmta-po-06v.sys.comcast.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750864AbaKYPUm (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:20:42 -0500 Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2014 10:20:40 -0500 Message-Id: <201411251520.sAPFKeID013159@hobgoblin.ariadne.com> From: worley@alum.mit.edu (Dale R. Worley) To: Karel Zak CC: psusi@ubuntu.com, drake@dasyatidae.net, util-linux@vger.kernel.org, 770211@bugs.debian.org In-reply-to: <20141124154604.GA2610@x2.net.home> (kzak@redhat.com) Subject: Re: LUKS partition types, redux References: <546D0495.2030803@dasyatidae.net> <20141124113733.GC926@x2.net.home> <547343EA.6090606@ubuntu.com> <20141124154604.GA2610@x2.net.home> Sender: util-linux-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: > From: Karel Zak > well, it's designed for auto-generated fstab-less systems like > containers/virt images, etc. I'm not big fan of this feature, but for > some use cases it makes sense. I thought that's what filesystem "label" values were for. > (And it's systemd upstream decision.) I've never run into something from systemd that I didn't consider bizarre and horrible, designed to solve problems I don't have at the cost of making my life worse. Dale